Can Bodymaker Forming Assembly With Cam-Driven Ram Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing can bodymaker drive assemblies, particularly those using a crank and swing arm configuration, face limitations such as vibration, overstroke, complex maintenance, and reduced efficiency due to constant motion and rapid direction changes, leading to suboptimal production rates and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A unified forming assembly with a stationary and moving assembly, where the moving assembly is coupled to a ram drive assembly, eliminating the need for a crank and swing arm, and utilizing a cam system for smooth ironing action with constant velocity, reducing vibrations and maintenance complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a crank and swing arm configuration is used in the drive assembly, then the bodymaker can convert rotational motion to reciprocal motion, but vibrations and overstroke occur due to rapid direction changes and constant motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the crank and swing arm components from the drive assembly, extracting the source of vibrations and overstroke. The cam mechanism directly drives the ram assembly without intermediate linkage, eliminating the harmful vibrations caused by rapid direction changes in the traditional crank-swing arm configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the crank-swing arm mechanical linkage system with a cam-based mechanism. The cam profile is specifically designed to provide smooth acceleration and deceleration of the ram assembly, substituting the problematic mechanical linkage with a cam-driven system that reduces vibrations and eliminates overstroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If a crank and swing arm configuration is used, then motion conversion is achieved, but device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation smoothnessVSAvoiddrive assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the swing arm and connecting rod components from the drive assembly, simplifying the overall structure. By eliminating these intermediate linkage components, the drive assembly becomes less complex and requires fewer maintenance operations while still achieving the necessary motion conversion through the cam mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a crank to convert rotational motion to reciprocal motion through multiple linkage stages, the patent inverts the approach by using a cam mechanism that directly imposes the desired reciprocal motion profile on the ram assembly. This inversion simplifies the mechanism by reducing the number of moving parts and linkage stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If crank rotates at high speed (320-400 rpm), then production output increases, but energy consumption and maintenance costs increase due to constant motion and rapid direction changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecans per minuteVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism is designed with specific dwell periods where the ram assembly remains stationary or moves at reduced speed between forming cycles. This periodic action allows the system to operate at high rotational speeds (320-400 rpm) while reducing energy consumption by eliminating the need for continuous high-speed reciprocal motion and rapid direction changes that characterize the crank-swing arm system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The cam profile incorporates gradual acceleration and deceleration phases that cushion the transitions between motion stages. This beforehand cushioning reduces shock loads and energy losses during direction changes, allowing the system to maintain high production rates with lower energy consumption and reduced maintenance requirements compared to the abrupt direction changes in crank-driven systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11529668B2Forming assembly for bodymaker and bodymaker including same
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 STOLLE MACHINERY CO LLC
  • US11529668B2 patent drawing
  • US11529668B2 patent drawing
  • US11529668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A forming assembly for use in a can bodymaker includes a stationary assembly and a moving assembly movably coupled to the stationary assembly. The stationary assembly and the moving assembly are a unified assembly that is structured to be selectively coupled to a mounting assembly body of the can bodymaker. The moving assembly is structured to be selectively coupled to a ram drive assembly of the can bodymaker and moved with respect to the stationary assembly thereby.