Cam Editor Motion Profiles Within Drive Limit Values

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-based design systems for electric drive systems lack the capability to ensure safe operation by preventing parameter inputs that violate physical limit values, leading to potential unsafe motion profiles.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based design system with a cam editor and limit value monitoring device that adjusts user inputs to prevent exceeding predetermined physical limit values, ensuring the motion profile remains within safe operational boundaries through graphical user interface settings and real-time monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the cam editor allows free parameter adjustment through graphical user interface, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential violation of physical limit values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustmentVSAvoidsafe operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores limit values for motion profile parameters (acceleration, velocity, jerk) based on the electric drive system's physical constraints before the user performs parameter adjustment. These predetermined limits are stored in a limit value memory and used to constrain subsequent user inputs, preventing unsafe parameter combinations from being entered in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The limit value monitoring device continuously monitors user-adjusted parameters in real-time and provides feedback by automatically correcting parameters that would violate physical limits. When a parameter adjustment approaches or exceeds predetermined limits, the system intervenes to adjust the parameter back within safe boundaries, ensuring reliability while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If limit value monitoring is implemented to ensure safe operation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe operationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The limit value monitoring device operates autonomously using predetermined limit values stored in memory. The system self-corrects parameter violations without requiring external intervention or complex control algorithms, as the monitoring device automatically compares user inputs against stored limits and adjusts parameters independently, minimizing additional system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by focusing monitoring efforts on key motion profile parameters (acceleration, velocity, jerk) rather than all possible system parameters. By converting physical constraints into predetermined numerical limits for these critical parameters, the system achieves reliable safety monitoring through simple parameter comparison and adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If extreme value analyses are performed to calculate limit values, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases during design phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelimit value accuracyVSAvoiddesign phase
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Extreme value analyses and limit value calculations are performed in advance during system setup or initial configuration, before the actual cam profile design work begins. These predetermined limits are stored in memory and reused throughout the design process, eliminating the need to recalculate them for each parameter adjustment and significantly reducing time loss during the design phase while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11373017B2Computer-based design system for an electric drive system
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 LENZE AUTOMATION
  • US11373017B2 patent drawing
  • US11373017B2 patent drawing
  • US11373017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-based design system for an electric drive system includes: a cam editor having a graphical user interface, wherein the graphical user interface sets values of parameters of a motion profile of the electric drive system on the basis of user inputs, a limit value memory, which stores limit values of the motion profile, and a limit value monitoring device, which monitors whether a value of a parameter inputted by a user input causes one or more of the stored limit values to be violated by the resulting motion profile and, in the case that one or more of the stored limit values are violated by the resulting motion profile, to adjust the inputted value of the parameter to such a value of the parameter that none of the stored limit values are violated by the resulting motion profile.