Cam Lever Mechanism for Roller Nip Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laminating and printing machines face issues with uneven nip force due to reaction forces causing roller bending, leading to web stretching, tearing, or non-uniform ink transfer and lamination creases, particularly in varying web thickness and operating speeds.

Innovation Solution

A cam and lever mechanism is employed to apply an adjustable torque to journal bearings, counteracting the bending moment caused by nip forces, allowing for proportional adjustment of nip pressure across the roller nip axis, using a lever arm with selectable attachment holes to vary leverage and accommodate different web conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If fixed journal bearings are used to support roller cylinders, then the structure is simple and stable, but the reaction force from frictional driving creates torque that causes roller bending and uneven nip pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller stabilityVSAvoidnip pressure uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies counterweights to the movable arms supporting the journal bearings. These counterweights generate counter-torques that balance the reaction torques from frictional driving forces, preventing roller bending and maintaining uniform nip pressure across the web throughout the printing cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from fixed journal bearings to movable journal bearings mounted on movable arms. This dynamic configuration allows the bearing positions to adjust during operation, enabling the application of counter-torques that vary with the printing cycle to maintain consistent roller alignment and nip pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If crown profiles are used to compensate for roller deflection, then uniform nip pressure can be achieved under fixed conditions, but changing nip pressure reduces uniformity and requires experimentation to adjust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenip pressure uniformityVSAvoidnip pressure adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static crown profiles with dynamic counter-torque mechanisms. The movable arms with counterweights can adjust the counter-torques in real-time during the printing cycle, allowing nip pressure to be varied for different web thicknesses and operating conditions while maintaining uniformity through active control rather than fixed geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables dynamic parameter changes in the counter-torque system. By adjusting the counterweight positions and movable arm configurations, the system can adapt counter-torques to match varying operating conditions such as different web thicknesses, speeds, and nip pressure requirements, eliminating the need for physical crown profile changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If intermediate bearings with adjustable eccentric collars are used to produce counterforce, then roller bending can be compensated, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller bending compensationVSAvoidbearing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the counter-torque generation function from complex intermediate bearing structures and implements it through simpler counterweights on movable arms. This separates the support function (handled by fixed ends) from the counter-torque function (handled by movable arms with counterweights), achieving bending compensation with reduced structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution maintains uniform nip pressure across the roller nip axis, accommodating changes in web thickness and operating speeds, preventing web stretching and ensuring consistent ink transfer and lamination quality.

Implementation Method 1

a cam and lever mechanism is provided to apply an adjustable torque to the journal bearing to produce a bending moment in the cylinders that is counter to the internal bending moment produced by the rolling contact of the cylinders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

The frictional driving force on the web produces an equal reaction force on the cylinders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The lever arm on which the cam is mounted has selectable attachment holes to increase or decrease the effective length of leverage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS8408123B2Apparatus and method for controlling roller nip force
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 ACCO BRANDS CORP
  • US8408123B2 patent drawing
  • US8408123B2 patent drawing
  • US8408123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device to provide a moment loading to one roller of a pair of nip rollers to counteract the bending moment created by a nip force between the rollers, the one roller being rotatably supported by a journal bearing at each end thereof, the device comprising a lever mechanism for imparting translational and torsional movement to the journal bearing with respect to a frame.