Content Addressable Memory for Parallel Conditional Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computing technologies face limitations as silicon feature sizes shrink, leading to issues like crosstalk, capacitive loading, defect density, and heat dissipation, which hinder the advancement of computational power, and existing parallel computing solutions are inefficient in extracting parallelism from control-driven code.

Innovation Solution

A configuration-based execution model combined with a content addressable memory (CAM) architecture that uses tags to identify operands, enabling conditional execution, function calls, recursion, and other parallel computing concepts by generating seed tokens and manipulating tag spaces to facilitate parallel processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional control-driven execution model is used, then programming simplicity is maintained, but computational parallelism and processing speed are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational parallelismVSAvoidexecution model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the execution model into configuration-based operational units, where each configuration represents a distinct computational task or function. This segmentation enables independent execution of multiple configurations in parallel, thereby increasing computational parallelism while maintaining manageable complexity through modular organization of computational tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional sequential control-driven execution to a dataflow-driven execution model that operates in a different dimensional space. By using content-addressable memory to store and retrieve configurations based on data content rather than sequential addresses, the system enables parallel execution paths without requiring complex interlocking control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If silicon feature sizes are shrunk to increase device density, then more devices can be packed, but crosstalk, capacitive loading, defect density, and heat dissipation problems worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidcrosstalk and heat dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces content-addressable memory as an intermediary layer between data storage and processing units. This intermediary enables direct content-based access to configurations without requiring dense interconnect structures, thereby reducing crosstalk and capacitive loading effects that would otherwise worsen with increased device density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control signal routing with content-based addressable memory access. Instead of using complex control wiring to sequence operations, the system uses data content itself as the address key, eliminating the need for dense control signal paths and reducing associated electrical interference and heat generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If parallel computing is implemented by extracting parallelism from control-driven code, then some parallel execution is achieved, but the complexity of determining parallel operations increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel execution capabilityVSAvoidparallelism extraction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional approach to parallel computing. Instead of trying to extract parallelism from sequential control-driven code through complex analysis, the system directly programs configurations in parallel using content-addressable memory. The parallelism is inherent in the dataflow-driven model rather than being extracted through complex static or dynamic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The content-addressable memory system automatically manages the retrieval and execution of configurations based on data content matches. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external complex control logic to determine which operations can execute in parallel, as the system autonomously identifies and executes compatible configurations based on data availability and configuration dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7707387B2Conditional execution via content addressable memory and parallel computing execution model
Publication Date: 2010.04.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US7707387B2 patent drawing
  • US7707387B2 patent drawing
  • US7707387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The use of a configuration-based execution model in conjunction with a content addressable memory (CAM) architecture provides a mechanism that enables performance of a number of computing concepts, including conditional execution, (e.g., If-Then statements and while loops), function calls and recursion. If-then and while loops are implemented by using a CAM feature that emits only complete operand sets from the CAM for processing; different seed operands are generated for different conditional evaluation results, and that seed operand is matched with computed data to for an if-then branch or upon exiting a while loop. As a result, downstream operators retrieve only completed operands. Function calls and recursion are handled by using a return tag as an operand along with function parameter data into the input tag space of a function. A recursive function is split into two halves, a pre-recursive half and a post-recursive half that executes after pre-recursive calls.