CAM Toolpath Generation Using Reinforcement Learning for CNC Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Selecting appropriate toolpaths in Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) software for subtractive manufacturing is challenging for novice users due to the complexity of CNC machines and the need for manual determination of toolpath categories and parameters, leading to time-consuming exploration and potential inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a machine learning algorithm employing reinforcement learning to automatically generate toolpaths for CNC machines, using scoring functions that prioritize toolpath smoothness, length, and collision avoidance, allowing for the generation of toolpaths suitable for 2.5-axis machining by processing three-dimensional models with convolutional neural networks and actor-critic architectures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual toolpath selection and parameter manipulation is used, then users can control the manufacturing process, but the time required to create toolpaths increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of toolpath generationVSAvoidtime to create toolpaths
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the CNC machine to automatically generate and optimize its own toolpaths through reinforcement learning. The machine learns from trial and error which toolpaths are most effective for different geometries, eliminating the need for manual programming and parameter adjustment by operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual system of toolpath selection with an intelligent software-based system. Instead of operators manually selecting toolpath categories and adjusting parameters, a reinforcement learning algorithm automatically generates optimized toolpaths, substituting human cognitive effort with computational intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple toolpath categories and parameters are provided for selection, then flexibility and control are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolpath selection flexibilityVSAvoidsoftware interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complexity of toolpath selection from the user interface and transfers it to the backend reinforcement learning system. Users no longer need to navigate complex menus and adjust numerous parameters; instead, they simply provide the geometry and desired outcomes, and the system automatically determines the appropriate toolpath strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it selects toolpath categories, optimizes parameters, ensures collision avoidance, and adapts to different geometries. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for separate controls and interfaces for each aspect of toolpath generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive parameter adjustment is required to achieve desired toolpaths, then manufacturing precision can be improved, but the skill level and training time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolpath accuracyVSAvoiduser skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning system incorporates feedback loops where the machine learns from the results of previous toolpath executions. By monitoring which toolpaths produce desired outcomes and which lead to collisions or inefficiencies, the system continuously improves its ability to generate accurate toolpaths without requiring users to understand complex parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning and optimization during the training phase, accumulating knowledge about effective toolpaths for various geometries. This preliminary action allows the system to provide accurate toolpath generation immediately when deployed, eliminating the need for users to undergo extensive training on parameter manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11782396B2Toolpath generation by reinforcement learning for computer aided manufacturing
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 AUTODESK INC
  • US11782396B2 patent drawing
  • US11782396B2 patent drawing
  • US11782396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including medium-encoded computer program products, for computer aided design and manufacture of physical structures using toolpaths generated by reinforcement learning for use with subtractive manufacturing systems and techniques, include: obtaining, in a computer aided design or manufacturing program, a three dimensional model of a manufacturable object; generating toolpaths that are usable by a computer-controlled manufacturing system to manufacture at least a portion of the manufacturable object by providing at least a portion of the three dimensional model to a machine learning algorithm that employs reinforcement learning, wherein the machine learning algorithm includes one or more scoring functions that include rewards that correlate with desired toolpath characteristics comprising toolpath smoothness, toolpath length, and avoiding collision with the three dimensional model; and providing the toolpaths to the computer-controlled manufacturing system to manufacture at least the portion of the manufacturable object.