Cambered Damping Sole with Segmented Arch Zone

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock-absorbing soles in sports shoes, such as those described in US2005/0166422-A1 and US-A-5 528 842, do not allow for natural flexing of the foot arch, reducing the foot's inherent damping capabilities during walking or running and causing unnecessary stress on the foot's muscles.

Innovation Solution

A shock-absorbing sole with a cambered arch zone and heel zone, made from flexible materials like thermoplastic or composite materials, that allows elastic flexing and return, mimicking the foot's natural movement to absorb shock and restore energy, with a wear layer for enhanced grip and adjustable elastic parts for customized fit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid base body is used in the shock-absorbing sole, then structural stability is improved, but the natural flexing of the foot arch is prevented, reducing damping capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddamping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sole is divided into multiple zones (heel zone, arch zone, forefoot zone) with different flexibility characteristics. The arch zone and heel zone are specifically designed to be flexible while the forefoot can be more rigid, allowing each segment to perform its specific function in the damping mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the sole have different mechanical properties. The arch zone and heel zone are made flexible to allow natural foot movement and damping, while other areas can maintain rigidity for structural support. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between overall stability and local damping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the sole is made flexible to allow natural foot movement, then damping capability is improved, but structural stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping capabilityVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the sole into zones with different flexibility levels, the patent achieves both flexibility where needed (arch and heel zones for damping) and rigidity where needed (forefoot for structural support), resolving the contradiction between damping capability and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If the arch zone is made rigid to provide structural support, then structural stability is improved, but the natural shock-absorbing properties of the foot are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidnatural shock-absorbing properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arch zone is specifically designed with flexible properties to allow natural foot movement and shock absorption, while other parts of the sole provide structural support. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between structural support and natural shock-absorbing properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Stability of the object's composition

If the heel zone is made rigid to provide stability, then structural stability is improved, but the natural eversion movement is restricted, increasing muscle stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmuscle stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heel zone is designed with flexible properties to allow natural eversion movement during walking and running, reducing stress on the posterior tibialis and long flexor muscles. This local flexibility resolves the contradiction between structural stability and reduction of muscle stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sole effectively dampens the impact of foot contact with the ground, reduces muscle stress, and restores biomechanically correct joint physiology by allowing natural foot movement, while maintaining energy return and stability through its design.

Implementation Method 1

the blade being able to deform elastically under the pressure of the foot so that the contact surface is oriented in the direction of a reduction in the heel angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The foot returns to its initial position when it leaves the ground, being propelled by the sole in a movement of inversion and reforming the arch of the arch of the foot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP1857005B1Damping sole and shoe with damping sole.
Publication Date: 2009.12.02 OTTE M CHRISTOPHE
  • EP1857005B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1857005B1 patent drawingFigure 3~3a
  • EP1857005B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

The sole (200) has a front foot zone (A), a heel zone (C), and an arch zone (B), where the heel zone is bent in the extension of the arch zone. The sole is flexible so that the arch zone and the heel zone elastically bend when a user carries his weight on the foot in a loading position, where a transversal section of a contact surface (205) in the heel zone is oriented along a direction of the heel. The sole is formed from a plate which is made of thermoplastic material e.g. polypropylene.