Cambered Serration Geometry for Wind Turbine Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional serrations on wind turbine rotor blades increase high-frequency noise due to side edge vortices from pressure imbalances, and existing noise reduction methods are inadequate in addressing this issue.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of cambered serrations with a three-dimensional streamline body design at the trailing edge of rotor blades, which eliminates sharp edges and manipulates the flow field to reduce noise by varying the curvature and angle of the serration surfaces, creating a panto cross-sectional shape that reduces scattering of pressure fluctuations into sound waves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional serrations are attached to the trailing edges of rotor blades, then noise reduction is achieved, but high-frequency noise increases due to side edge vortices from pressure imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic noiseVSAvoidhigh-frequency noise from side edge vortices
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The serration design employs asymmetric geometry with different radii of curvature on the suction side surface (first radius) and pressure side surface (second radius). This asymmetry creates a cambered cross-sectional shape that eliminates the sharp side edges responsible for vortex generation, while maintaining the noise reduction function through modified pressure distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces sharp edges with curved surfaces by defining the suction side surface with a first radius of curvature and the pressure side surface with a second radius of curvature. This curvature eliminates the abrupt pressure changes at sharp edges that generate high-frequency noise, while the cambered shape maintains effective noise reduction through gradual pressure transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Power

If rotor blade size increases to improve energy capture, then kinetic energy capture improves, but noise production increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekinetic energy captureVSAvoidnoise production
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from traditional two-dimensional serration profiles to three-dimensional cambered serrations with varying radii of curvature in both the chord-wise and span-wise directions. This dimensional enhancement allows the serrations to effectively manage noise from larger rotor blades by creating a more complex flow field manipulation that scales with blade size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If conventional serrations are used, then simple geometry is maintained, but noise-generating side edges cannot be eliminated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveserration geometryVSAvoidside edge vortices
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The serration design applies different radii of curvature to different local regions: the suction side surface has a first radius of curvature while the pressure side surface has a second radius of curvature. This local differentiation eliminates side edge vortices at critical locations without requiring complete redesign of the entire serration structure, balancing complexity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively suppresses aerodynamic noise, particularly at low frequencies, by minimizing the generation of turbulent fluctuations and guiding airflow to achieve significant noise reduction.

Implementation Method 1

the noise reducers of the present disclosure are configured to modify the scattering of pressure fluctuations into sound waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure fluctuation scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

Traditional serrations, however, can suffer from a high-frequency noise increase due to the side edge vortices created by the pressure imbalance on both sides of the serration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic noise generation: Sound

Data Source

PatentEP3844386B1Noise reducer for a wind turbine rotor blade having a cambered serration
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 GENERAL ELECTRIC RENOVABLES ESPANA SL
  • EP3844386B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3844386B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3844386B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A rotor blade assembly (100) for a wind turbine (10) includes a rotor blade (10) having surfaces defining a pressure side (22), a suction side (24), a leading edge (26), and a trailing edge (28) extending between a blade tip (32) and a blade root (34). The rotor blade assembly (100) also includes at least one noise reducer (102) adjacent to the trailing edge (28). The noise reducer(s) (102) includes at least one serration (104) extending beyond the trailing edge (28) in a chord-wise direction of the rotor blade (16). The serration(s) (104) also includes a suction side surface (108) and a pressure side surface (110). The suction side surface (108) defines a first radius of curvature (116) in the chord-wise direction and the pressure side surface (110) defines a second radius of curvature (118) in the chord-wise direction. Further, the first radius of curvature (116) may be larger than the second radius of curvature (118) such that the suction side surface (108) is flatter than the pressure side surface (110) or vice versa.