Camera Activation via Collaborative Acoustic Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable cameras used by public safety officers face challenges with battery life and data storage, making continuous recording impractical, and manual activation is not always feasible in critical situations.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for automatically activating cameras using collaborative microphones that send and modify acoustic signatures to trigger camera activation, allowing for efficient and timely recording of events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous recording is used, then complete event coverage is achieved, but battery life is depleted and data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent coverageVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic audio sampling and acoustic signature detection to trigger camera activation only when relevant events are detected, rather than continuous recording. The camera activates based on periodic acoustic event detection (gunshots, screams, etc.) while remaining inactive otherwise, conserving battery life while ensuring complete coverage of critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The wearable device autonomously detects acoustic signatures and automatically activates the camera without manual intervention. The system self-manages the recording process by continuously monitoring audio inputs, detecting event signatures, and triggering appropriate recording actions, eliminating the need for user operation while maintaining event coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If continuous recording is used, then complete event coverage is achieved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent coverageVSAvoiddata storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates only the critical audio events that warrant video recording by detecting specific acoustic signatures (gunshots, screams, car alarms). By extracting only these relevant events from the continuous audio stream, the system triggers camera activation selectively, preventing storage of unnecessary video data while ensuring complete coverage of critical incidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the camera from continuous recording to event-triggered recording. By monitoring audio parameters for specific acoustic signatures and using these as activation triggers, the system dynamically adjusts when the camera records, reducing overall data storage requirements while maintaining complete event coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If manual activation is used, then battery life is conserved, but critical events may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifeVSAvoidevent detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors audio inputs and automatically detects critical events through acoustic signature recognition. The wearable device self-activates the camera when event signatures are detected, eliminating the need for manual user activation while ensuring reliable detection of critical events. This autonomous operation conserves battery life compared to continuous recording while maintaining high event detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors audio inputs and uses feedback from acoustic signature detection to control camera activation. When the audio monitoring detects specific event signatures, it provides feedback that triggers camera activation. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures reliable event detection while activating the camera only when necessary, conserving battery life compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Quantity of substance

If manual activation is used, then data storage is reduced, but response time in critical situations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storageVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously monitoring audio inputs and pre-detecting critical events through acoustic signature recognition before video recording begins. The audio monitoring is always active, detecting events instantly as they occur, and immediately triggering camera activation. This preliminary audio detection eliminates response time delays while the selective triggering based on acoustic signatures reduces unnecessary data storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11475746B2Method and apparatus for camera activation
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11475746B2 patent drawing
  • US11475746B2 patent drawing
  • US11475746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

During operation a first personal-area network will activate a first camera. The first camera may be manually activated, or triggered by an audio signal. The event that causes the first camera to activate will also cause the personal-area network to send an acoustic signature to other personal-area networks. Personal-area networks that receive the acoustic signature will modify audio triggers so that the acoustic signature can be better distinguished from other noises.