Vehicle Camera Adhesion Detection Under Low-Light and High-Speed Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional extraneous-matter detecting apparatuses for vehicle cameras face challenges in accurately determining adhesion due to varying vehicle travel states, particularly in low-light conditions or high-speed scenarios, leading to potential erroneous determinations.

Innovation Solution

An extraneous-matter detecting apparatus that sets divided regions in a captured image and computes a representative luminance value, using vehicle speed and luminance to determine a transition state, thereby controlling the adhesion state information to prevent erroneous determinations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If adhesion determination is executed based on luminance value in divided regions, then extraneous matter detection capability is improved, but erroneous determination occurs in low-light conditions or high-speed scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion detection accuracyVSAvoiddetermination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the determination state adjustable based on vehicle speed and luminance conditions. The system transitions between different determination states (first state for high reliability, second state for high precision) according to real-time vehicle conditions, allowing the detection criteria to adapt dynamically rather than remaining static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by using vehicle speed and luminance value as variable parameters to determine the determination state. When vehicle speed exceeds a threshold or luminance falls below a threshold, the system switches to the first determination state with more stringent criteria, otherwise it uses the second state for higher precision detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If detection criteria are made stringent to reduce erroneous determination, then determination reliability is improved, but detection precision in normal conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination reliabilityVSAvoidadhesion detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection stringency based on vehicle conditions. In normal conditions (low vehicle speed, adequate luminance), the system uses the second determination state with less stringent criteria for high precision. When conditions deteriorate (high speed, low light), it switches to the first determination state with stringent criteria for high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of vehicle speed and luminance conditions before executing adhesion determination. Based on this preliminary evaluation, it pre-selects the appropriate determination state, ensuring that the correct detection criteria are applied before the actual detection occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If detection is performed in all conditions, then detection coverage is improved, but false positives increase in challenging environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes detection parameters based on vehicle speed and luminance thresholds. When vehicle speed exceeds a first threshold or luminance falls below a second threshold, the system switches to the first determination state that prevents false positives in challenging environments, while maintaining detection capability in normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The determination state acts as an intermediary between the raw detection data and the final adhesion conclusion. It mediates the detection process by applying different evaluation criteria based on vehicle conditions, filtering out false positives while preserving true detections across varying environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11093786B2Extraneous-matter detecting apparatus and extraneous-matter detecting method
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 DENSO TEN LTD
  • US11093786B2 patent drawing
  • US11093786B2 patent drawing
  • US11093786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An extraneous-matter detecting apparatus according to an embodiment includes a region setting unit, a computing unit, and a state setting unit. The region setting unit sets, for a captured image captured by an image capturing device provided in a vehicle, a plurality of divided regions. The computing unit computes a representative value of luminance in a target region for detecting an adhesion of an extraneous matter. The target region includes the plurality of divided regions. The state setting unit sets, based on a vehicle speed and the representative value of luminance in the target region, a transition state of information that indicates an adhesion state of an extraneous matter in the divided region.