Tamper-Evident Camera Blocker with Position Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for restricting camera usage in sensitive areas, such as security establishments or private conferences, are ineffective as they either fail to prevent image recording or overly restrict device functionality, leading to non-compliance and security breaches.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a blocker attached to image recording apparatuses, equipped with a transducer and controller, which detects and records changes in the blocker's position, ensuring the camera cannot record images effectively, and optionally alerts authorities of tampering attempts through various signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a camera is physically blocked by an opaque screen, then image recording is inhibited, but the screen can be easily removed and the restriction becomes ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of camera usage restrictionVSAvoidease of removal of blocking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-attaching the opaque screen to the camera device in a manner that requires deliberate effort to remove. The screen is attached with adhesive or mounting mechanisms that are applied in advance, creating a permanent-looking restriction that discourages casual removal while still allowing authorized removal with proper tools and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary monitoring system that tracks the position and integrity of the opaque screen. Sensors detect attempts to remove or tamper with the screen, and this information is transmitted to remote authorities. The intermediary system transforms a simple physical barrier into a monitored security measure that provides feedback on compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the camera device is switched off to restrict camera usage, then image recording is inhibited, but all other functionalities are also disabled which is over restrictive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of camera usage restrictionVSAvoidavailability of other device functionalities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the camera function from the overall device operation by applying the opaque screen specifically to the camera lens or sensor area. This targeted approach inhibits only the image recording capability while leaving the device's other functionalities (such as voice calls, messaging, and other non-visual communications) completely operational. The restriction is surgically applied to only the problematic function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the restriction localized to the camera component rather than the entire device. The opaque screen is positioned specifically over the lens or sensor, creating a localized barrier that affects only light entry for image capture. This allows the rest of the device to maintain full functionality while the camera function is selectively inhibited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If participants are instructed not to take pictures, then camera usage may be restricted, but people may not comply and illegal pictures may still be taken

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of restriction implementationVSAvoidcompliance with camera usage restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-establishing physical and monitored barriers before any camera usage can occur. The opaque screen is attached in advance to prevent image capture, and monitoring systems are activated to detect and report any tampering attempts. This preemptive approach creates immediate deterrence and removes the need to rely on voluntary compliance, as the restriction is physically enforced from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively inhibits image recording while allowing other device functionalities to remain operational, providing a secure means to enforce camera usage restrictions and alerting authorities of any attempts to bypass the restrictions.

Implementation Method 1

The transducer can include a piezoelectric sensor. The piezoelectric sensor can be adapted to be subject to a mechanical force, upon tampering, and to react to said mechanical force when the blocker moves from the attached position to another position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10218890B2Device for inhibiting operation of an image recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 KHALIFA UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US10218890B2 patent drawing
  • US10218890B2 patent drawing
  • US10218890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a device for attachment to an image recording apparatus, the device comprising a blocker, attachable to said image recording apparatus, configured to inhibit said apparatus from recording an image when attached thereto; a transducer, connected to the blocker, configured to detect the change of position of the blocker between an attached position, wherein said apparatus is inhibited, and another position; and a controller, connected to the transducer, configured to store the position of the blocker when attached to said image recording apparatus and indicate if the blocker has changed position after it has been attached.