Vehicle Camera Calibration with Infrastructure-Based Offset Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle camera calibration systems at end-of-line stations are inefficient due to labor, time, and infrastructure requirements, and fail to account for dynamic conditions that affect accuracy, such as lighting and off-axis maneuvers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for calibrating onboard image sensors using infrastructure and onboard data to generate an offset matrix, adjusting the rotation matrix dynamically based on infrastructure-based and image-based positional characteristics, and employing recursive updating routines to improve accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a dedicated camera calibration EOL station with fiducial marker is used, then calibration accuracy can be maintained under controlled conditions, but labor requirements, time consumption, and infrastructure resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle itself serves as the calibration platform by utilizing its own onboard sensors (lidar, radar, ultrasonic sensors) to detect environmental features and perform self-calibration of the camera system, eliminating the need for external dedicated calibration equipment and personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The onboard sensor suite originally designed for navigation and obstacle detection is repurposed to perform camera calibration functions, allowing the same sensors to serve multiple functions: navigation, obstacle avoidance, and calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a static fiducial marker calibration method is used, then calibration setup is simplified, but dynamic conditions such as lighting changes, off-axis maneuvers, and signal noise are not accounted for, reducing calibration accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration setup simplicityVSAvoidcalibration accuracy under dynamic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system transitions from static fiducial marker detection to dynamic environmental feature detection, where the vehicle moves through the environment and uses multiple sensors to capture and process changing spatial relationships, allowing calibration under varying lighting and angular conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from multiple onboard sensors (lidar, radar, ultrasonic) to continuously monitor and adjust calibration parameters based on detected environmental features, compensating for dynamic conditions such as lighting changes and off-axis maneuvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12561839B2Systems and methods for calibrating image sensors of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12561839B2 patent drawing
  • US12561839B2 patent drawing
  • US12561839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining infrastructure data from one or more infrastructure sensors, determining an infrastructure-based positional characteristic of the vehicle based on the infrastructure data, obtaining onboard image data from the onboard image sensor, determining an image-based positional characteristic of the vehicle based on the onboard image data and a digital twin of the manufacturing environment, generating an offset matrix based on the infrastructure-based positional characteristic and the image-based positional characteristic, and selectively adjusting a rotation matrix of the onboard image sensor based on the offset matrix and one or more additional offset matrices.