Vehicle Camera Calibration via Automatic Region of Interest Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle camera calibration methods require manual user input to define a region of interest, which can be inefficient and prone to errors due to variable mounting orientations and positions, especially for aftermarket cameras.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a camera and a processing unit that identifies objects in front of the vehicle using a neural network model, determines their distribution, and automatically calculates a region of interest based on this distribution, allowing for automatic calibration and periodic updates without user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual user input is required to define region of interest during calibration, then calibration accuracy can be improved, but calibration efficiency and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration ease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically identifying objects in the camera field of view and determining the region of interest without requiring manual user input. The processing unit analyzes captured images, identifies objects such as vehicles or pedestrians, and automatically defines the ROI based on object distribution, enabling the system to calibrate itself independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures multiple images of the environment before final calibration is needed. By pre-identifying objects in these images and determining their distribution patterns, the system prepares calibration data in advance, allowing automatic ROI definition to occur quickly when calibration is triggered without requiring real-time manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual user input is required to define region of interest during calibration, then calibration precision can be improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration precisionVSAvoidcalibration productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing unit automatically performs object identification and ROI determination through algorithmic analysis of captured images. The system uses computer vision techniques to detect objects, calculate their spatial distribution, and define the region of interest automatically, eliminating the need for manual calibration operations and significantly improving calibration productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of placing markers or drawing ROIs by hand is replaced with an automated computer vision system. The processing unit uses image processing algorithms to automatically identify objects and calculate their distribution patterns, substituting human manual operations with automated computational methods that are both precise and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If cameras are mounted at different angles and positions, then adaptability improves, but calibration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting position adaptabilityVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system is designed to dynamically adapt to different camera mounting positions and angles. Rather than requiring fixed installation parameters, the system automatically detects objects in the actual camera field of view and determines the ROI based on the observed object distribution, allowing the calibration process to adjust dynamically to any mounting configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its calibration approach based on the actual mounting parameters. Instead of using predetermined calibration parameters, the processing unit analyzes the captured images to determine object distribution patterns and automatically adjusts the ROI definition according to the specific mounting position and orientation, effectively adapting to parameter variations without increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the entire camera image is processed, then detection completeness improves, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the relevant portion of the camera image for processing by automatically determining a region of interest based on object distribution. By identifying objects in the full image first and then extracting the specific ROI that contains these objects, the system processes only the necessary subset of the image data, reducing computation time while maintaining detection completeness for relevant objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary object identification across the entire image to determine the region of interest before final processing. By pre-analyzing the full image to locate objects and calculate their distribution, the system identifies which portions of the image are relevant, allowing subsequent processing to focus only on the extracted ROI rather than the entire image, thus reducing computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11688176B2Devices and methods for calibrating vehicle cameras
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 NAUTO INC
  • US11688176B2 patent drawing
  • US11688176B2 patent drawing
  • US11688176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes: a first camera configured to view an environment outside a vehicle; and a processing unit configured to receive images generated at different respective times by the first camera; wherein the processing unit is configured to identify objects in front of the vehicle based on the respective images generated at the different respective times, determine a distribution of the identified objects, and determine a region of interest based on the distribution of the identified objects in the respective images generated at the different respective times.