Automated Camera Configuration via Estimator Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deploying and configuring a large number of camera devices in smart city systems is a time-consuming and inefficient process, requiring manual determination of configuration parameters, which wastes computing, networking, human, and transportation resources due to the need for manual measurements and corrections.

Innovation Solution

A registration platform that utilizes modeling to automatically determine configuration parameters for camera devices by processing initial registration data, location data, and map data, employing estimator and parameter optimization models to generate and apply camera and event parameters for optimal configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual determination of configuration parameters is used for camera devices, then configuration accuracy can be achieved through technician expertise, but the process becomes time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration parameter accuracyVSAvoidcamera installation and configuration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the camera device automatically determines its own configuration parameters through onboard sensors and processors. The device performs self-calibration by capturing images of calibration patterns and computing intrinsic parameters without human intervention, eliminating the need for manual technician configuration while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement processes with automated computational methods. Instead of technicians physically measuring and configuring cameras, the system uses image processing algorithms and computer vision techniques to automatically calculate configuration parameters from captured images, substituting mechanical human operations with computational automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration processes are used for deploying camera devices, then flexibility in handling diverse scenarios can be maintained, but computing, networking, human, and transportation resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling diverse camera deployment scenariosVSAvoidwasted computing, networking, human, and transportation resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The camera device performs self-configuration and self-calibration autonomously using onboard computational resources. This eliminates the need for external human resources, transportation for technician deployment, and manual intervention, while the adaptive algorithms maintain versatility across different deployment scenarios through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts camera configuration parameters based on environmental conditions and deployment requirements. By dynamically changing parameters such as exposure, gain, and calibration values based on real-time sensor data and image analysis, the system adapts to diverse scenarios without requiring manual reconfiguration or additional resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated modeling approaches are used to determine configuration parameters, then time and resource efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera configuration speedVSAvoidautomated modeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The camera device incorporates integrated onboard processing capabilities that perform automated calibration and configuration tasks using built-in sensors and computational algorithms. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external complex configuration systems while maintaining high productivity through automated parameter determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses digital copies and representations of calibration patterns captured by the camera to compute configuration parameters. By processing image data and creating computational models from captured scenes rather than requiring complex physical measurement equipment, the system achieves automated configuration with reduced overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10911747B1Systems and methods for utilizing modeling to automatically determine configuration parameters for cameras
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US10911747B1 patent drawing
  • US10911747B1 patent drawing
  • US10911747B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may receive initial registration data identifying initial camera parameters associated with a camera device provided at a location, and may receive location data associated with the location captured by the camera device. The device may receive map data identifying a map image of the location, and may transform the initial registration data into estimated camera parameters. The device may process the location data, with the estimator model, to generate extracted data, and may process the estimated camera parameters, the extracted data, and the map data, with a parameter optimization model, to identify camera parameters for the camera device. The device may provide the camera parameters to the camera device to cause the camera device to be configured based on the camera parameters.