Distributed Camera Control With Pre-Event Buffering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional camera triggering systems suffer from latency issues, false positives, inability to coordinate heterogeneous camera arrays, lack of intelligent pre-capture buffer management, and limited scalability, leading to missed shots and inefficient event capture.

Innovation Solution

A distributed sensor-triggered camera control platform with cognitive triggering capabilities, pre-buffer management, and hierarchical scaling, utilizing a network of specialized nodes for intelligent event recognition and coordinated camera control across multiple manufacturers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional camera triggering systems are used, then direct human operation is achieved, but latency issues cause missed shots of fleeting events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming precisionVSAvoidcapture latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously capturing and buffering video frames before a trigger event occurs. When a trigger condition is met, the system immediately retrieves and exports the pre-captured frames without requiring post-event capture, thereby eliminating latency and ensuring no fleeting moments are missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If simple threshold-based triggers are used, then automated capture is achieved, but false positives occur triggering on any movement or sound

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated captureVSAvoidtrigger accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by transitioning from simple threshold-based trigger conditions to sophisticated machine learning models that analyze multiple features simultaneously. These models evaluate patterns, contexts, and multiple parameters to distinguish genuine events from background noise, dramatically reducing false positives while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent trigger units are used for multi-camera setups, then camera coordination is achieved, but system complexity increases and synchronization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-camera coordinationVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple independent trigger units into a single centralized trigger controller that manages all cameras. This unified controller receives sensor inputs, processes trigger conditions through machine learning models, and simultaneously commands multiple cameras, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining full multi-camera coordination capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If pre-capture buffer features are manually controlled, then capture capability is achieved, but capture latency remains relevant and shots are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuffer controlVSAvoidcapture latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically managing the pre-capture buffer through programmatic control. The trigger controller autonomously determines when to arm the buffer, how long to pre-capture, and when to retrieve frames, eliminating the need for manual half-press operations and ensuring optimal capture timing without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Ease of manufacture

If single-vendor ecosystems are used for camera arrays, then integration simplicity is achieved, but scalability and flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration simplicityVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a vendor-agnostic trigger controller that can interface with cameras from multiple manufacturers through standardized protocols. The centralized architecture provides a unified control interface that manages heterogeneous camera arrays, enabling both integration simplicity and extensive scalability across different vendors and camera models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12574654B1Distributed camera control architectures
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 ROCKET TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC
  • US12574654B1 patent drawing
  • US12574654B1 patent drawing
  • US12574654B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for latency-independent automated image capture. The system includes a sensor network, camera control system, cognitive trigger system, orchestration engine, and hierarchical architecture. Sensor nodes detect events and transmit trigger signals with confidence metrics. The camera system maintains pre-event frame recording, executing capture commands to store both pre- and post-event frames. The system supports simultaneous control of heterogeneous cameras through abstracted interfaces. Cognitive triggers use trainable pattern recognition to reduce false positives. The orchestration engine enables both reactive and predictive multi-camera control based on logical sensor combinations. Hierarchical architecture allows scaling from single-camera setups to multi-zone deployments. By using pre-event buffer recording, the system captures moments that occur before commands are processed, eliminating the impact of latency.