Camera Focus Control Using Multi-Modal Viewer Attention Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing camera focus adjustment techniques fail to account for the attention or interests of the viewer, leading to inconsistent focus on objects at different depths in captured images.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes multi-modal sensor fusion to determine appropriate camera focus adjustments based on user attention and interest, incorporating data from various sensors such as eye tracking, environment sensors, and hand detection to adjust focus accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional camera focus adjustment techniques are used, then the camera can capture objects at certain depths clearly, but objects at other depths (particularly those of viewer interest) may not be in focus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to viewer interest
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses eye tracking sensors to detect viewer gaze direction and hand detection sensors to identify objects of interest, providing feedback about viewer attention. This feedback loop enables the camera to dynamically adjust focus to match viewer interest rather than relying on static or depth-based focus algorithms alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensors (eye tracking, hand detection, depth sensing) act as intermediaries between the viewer and the camera focus system. These sensors capture viewer behavior and translate it into focus adjustment commands, serving as a bridge that enables the camera to understand and respond to viewer interest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensor-based distance signals are fused to determine focus adjustments, then focus accuracy corresponding to viewer interest is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus distance accuracyVSAvoidsensor fusion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The focus determination process is segmented into distinct functional modules: eye tracking module, hand detection module, depth sensing module, and fusion module. Each module independently processes its specific sensor data and contributes to the overall focus decision, making the complex system more manageable and maintainable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor fusion system is designed to handle multiple types of distance signals (vergence distance from eye tracking, hand distance from hand detection, object distance from depth sensing) through a unified fusion characteristic framework. This multi-functional approach allows the same fusion mechanism to process diverse sensor inputs without requiring separate processing paths for each sensor type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4657871A1Multi-modal sensor fusion for camera focus adjustments
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 APPLE INC
  • EP4657871A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4657871A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP4657871A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for adjusting camera focus so that objects of interest (e.g., to the image viewer) or objects being attended to (e.g., what the image viewer is attentive to) in the captured camera images are more likely to be in focus in captured images. Information from various sources (e.g., multiple sensors providing information about the user and/or environment) may be fused, e.g., combined or accounted for collectively, to determine how to adjust camera focus in a way that corresponds to viewer interests and/or attention. This may involve determining a fusion characteristic that specifies how to fuse the multiple signals to determine focus adjustments, e.g., selecting or configuring a multi-modal optimization and/or a smoothing function. The fusion characteristic may account for signal confidence. The fusion characteristic may correspond to a determined operational mode used to determine which signals will be used and how the signals will be combined.