Camera-Guided Weeding Injection Unit for Crop-Safe Plant Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural machinery lacks the capability to accurately distinguish between crops and weeds and simultaneously perform targeted weeding and substance application, such as fertilization, without damaging the crops.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous agricultural vehicle equipped with a weeding-injection unit featuring adjustable weeding knives and injection nozzles, controlled by a computer system that identifies plants using cameras and maps, allowing precise weeding and targeted substance application based on plant type and growth stage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional agricultural machinery performs weeding and substance application, then field treatment is achieved, but it cannot distinguish between crops and weeds leading to crop damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant identification accuracyVSAvoidcrop damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the field treatment process by individually identifying and treating each plant based on its type. The camera captures images of individual plants, the control unit processes each plant separately to determine if it is a crop or weed, and the treatment is applied selectively to each detected plant rather than treating the entire field uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by providing different treatments to different locations based on plant type. Crops receive protective treatment while weeds receive herbicide application, with the treatment type and amount customized for each specific plant location. The injection system delivers substances locally to the root zone of identified weeds while avoiding crops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If targeted weeding and substance application is implemented, then treatment precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple functions into a single integrated platform combining camera-based plant identification, control unit processing, mechanical weeding knives, and substance injection capabilities. This unified system performs detection, decision-making, and treatment delivery through one coordinated mechanism rather than separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment mechanism serves multiple functions: it can mechanically cut weeds with knives, inject herbicides into weed roots, or apply fertilizers to crop roots. The same physical apparatus adapts its function based on plant identification results, eliminating the need for separate dedicated systems for each treatment type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If integrated weeding and injection tools are used, then operational efficiency is improved, but the system must handle multiple substances requiring complex valve regulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidvalve and substance management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve system is dynamic and adaptive, automatically switching between different substances and flow rates based on real-time plant identification. The control unit adjusts valve positions and opening degrees dynamically according to whether a crop or weed is detected, the plant's growth stage, and the required treatment type, optimizing substance delivery without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Extent of automation

If autonomous vehicle with camera and control system is deployed, then automated plant identification is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system is self-sufficient in performing the complete treatment process autonomously. The camera independently captures plant images, the control unit independently processes images and makes treatment decisions, and the treatment mechanism independently executes the appropriate action without human intervention, enabling the vehicle to service itself through automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4197304B1Vehicles and methods for treating an agricultural field
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 AGCO INT GMBH
  • EP4197304B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4197304B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4197304B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~5E

AI summary

A vehicle (101) for treating an agricultural field includes a weeding-injection unit (106) and a control unit (124). The weeding-injection unit includes a valve (108), at least one weeding knife (110, 122), at least one actuator (133, 134) configured to move the at least one weeding knife, an injection line (111) carried by the at least one weeding knife, and a valve (108) configured to regulate flow of a substance through the injection line. The control unit is configured to identify a plant (129, 130) and control the at least one actuator and the valve to treat the identified plant. Related methods are also disclosed.