Single Camera Obstacle Detection via Infrared and Angle Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smart electronic devices, such as driverless cars and sweeper robots, face challenges in detecting obstacles efficiently due to the increased hardware cost and power consumption associated with using multiple cameras or sensors.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device equipped with a single camera and infrared sensor system that captures images and calculates distances using infrared rays, allowing for obstacle detection and avoidance by adjusting the camera's angle to capture multiple images and determine if obstacles are planar or non-planar, thereby reducing hardware costs and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple cameras or sensors are used to detect obstacles, then obstacle detection capability is improved, but hardware cost and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a single camera with an infrared sensor to create a hybrid detection system. The infrared sensor detects thermal radiation from obstacles while the camera captures visual information, allowing the system to achieve reliable obstacle detection with fewer components than multiple cameras would require

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single camera system is made multi-functional by integrating it with infrared sensing capabilities. The system can detect both visible light images and infrared thermal signatures, enabling it to perform multiple detection functions that would traditionally require separate dedicated sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple cameras or sensors are used to detect obstacles, then obstacle detection capability is improved, but hardware cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection capabilityVSAvoidhardware cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges a camera and infrared sensor into a single integrated detection system. This combination achieves reliable obstacle detection through complementary sensing modalities while reducing the total component count and associated hardware costs compared to using multiple cameras

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The infrared sensor acts as an intermediary that enhances the camera's obstacle detection capability. By detecting thermal radiation that the camera cannot perceive, the infrared sensor provides complementary information that improves overall detection reliability without requiring additional cameras

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a single camera is used to detect obstacles by capturing multiple images at different angles, then hardware cost is reduced, but detection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware costVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection using the infrared sensor to identify potential obstacles and their thermal signatures. This preliminary action allows the camera to focus on specific areas of interest, reducing the number of images needed and accelerating the overall detection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from infrared sensor detection to guide camera operation. When the infrared sensor detects thermal radiation indicating an obstacle, the system activates the camera to capture images of that specific area, creating a feedback loop that reduces unnecessary imaging and speeds up detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects obstacles and avoids collisions by using a single camera and infrared sensor system, reducing hardware costs and power consumption while maintaining efficient obstacle detection capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

a detecting device 30 transmits infrared rays and receives reflected infrared rays. The detecting module 101 calculates a distance between the object 2 and the electronic device 1 according to a time interval between transmitting the infrared rays and receiving the reflected infrared rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

The detecting module 101 calculates a distance between the object 2 and the electronic device 1 according to a time interval between transmitting the infrared rays and receiving the reflected infrared rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS11037003B2Electronic device and method for detecting obstacle
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO LTD
  • US11037003B2 patent drawing
  • US11037003B2 patent drawing
  • US11037003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting an obstacle applicable in an electronic device includes detecting whether at least one object is within a line of sight of an image capturing device. The image capturing device is controlled to capture a first image of the object and the image capturing device is caused to move until a capturing angle for capturing another image of the object is changed. The image capturing device is controlled to capture a second image of the object and a determination is made as to whether the object in the first image is the same as the object in the second image. For such recognized objects, the object is determined to be a non-planar obstacle when the object in the first image is not the same as the object in the second image.