Shape Recovery from Camera Motion for Unknown Material Reflectance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer vision methods fail to accurately determine shape from small camera motion when objects have unknown surface reflectance, as they rely on incorrect assumptions like Lambertian reflectance, which is not applicable to materials such as metals and plastics.

Innovation Solution

Deriving relationships between spatial and temporal image derivatives and bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) derivatives under camera motion, leading to the formulation of quasilinear partial differential equations for solving surface depth in orthographic and perspective projections, allowing for shape recovery even with unknown BRDF.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If Lambertian assumptions are used to solve shape from camera motion, then the shape recovery process is simplified, but the accuracy deteriorates for objects with unknown surface reflectance such as metals and plastics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape recovery process complexityVSAvoidshape recovery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter assumptions from Lambertian reflectance to general BRDF models. By deriving differential equations that hold for any isotropic BRDF, the method adapts to unknown surface reflectance properties while maintaining computational feasibility through the differential equation framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces BRDF derivatives as an intermediary concept to bridge the gap between image intensity changes and surface geometry. By relating spatial and temporal image derivatives to BRDF derivatives through camera motion, the method mediates between observable image data and unobservable surface properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If general BRDF models are used to account for unknown surface reflectance, then the accuracy of shape recovery is improved, but the complexity of the mathematical formulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape recovery accuracyVSAvoidmathematical formulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the general BRDF model by focusing on isotropic BRDFs, which depend only on the angle between the surface normal and the half-angle vector. This parameter reduction maintains generality for unknown materials while making the mathematical formulation tractable through the resulting differential equations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex shape recovery problem into two independent parts: (1) estimating the surface gradient field from image derivatives, and (2) solving for depth using the gradient field. This segmentation reduces the overall complexity by breaking down the coupled problem into manageable steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If orthographic projection is used, then the quasilinear PDE formulation is simplified, but the applicability to perspective cameras is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePDE formulation complexityVSAvoidprojection type applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the method from static orthographic projection to dynamic perspective projection by incorporating the perspective projection matrix into the differential equation formulation. This allows the same fundamental approach to adapt to different projection geometries through the projection matrix parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal framework that handles both orthographic and perspective projections through a single mathematical formulation. By using the general projection matrix P and its derivatives, the method achieves multi-functionality across different camera models without requiring separate derivations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9336601B2Shape from camera motion for unknown material reflectance
Publication Date: 2016.05.10 NEC CORP
  • US9336601B2 patent drawing
  • US9336601B2 patent drawing
  • US9336601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer vision method that includes deriving a relationship of spatial and temporal image derivatives of an object to bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) derivatives under camera motion, and deriving with a processor a quasilinear partial differential equation for solving surfaced depth for orthographic projections using the relationship of spatial and temporal image derivatives without requiring knowledge of the BRDF. The method may further recover surface depth for an object with unknown BRDF under perspective projection.