Automotive Camera Noise Filtering Texture Preservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional High Dynamic Range (HDR) automotive camera imagers suffer from texture loss at bright light conditions due to suboptimal noise filtering, which results in increased noise and a non-continuous Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), leading to poor image quality and reduced texture preservation.

Innovation Solution

A testing system that processes multiple frames of image data with different register settings to measure the signal-to-noise ratio and texture Key Performance Indicator (KPI), optimizing the camera's noise filtering to find a 'sweet spot' that balances noise reduction and texture preservation, using methods such as the integral of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) power between 1/(2.5*pixel size and 1/(5*pixel size) as a KPI.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional HDR noise filtering is applied, then noise is reduced, but texture preservation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidtexture preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic register settings that adjust noise filtering strength based on local image characteristics and lighting conditions. The system transitions from static to dynamic control, allowing the camera to adaptively balance noise reduction and texture preservation across different regions and conditions, resolving the contradiction by making the filtering process context-dependent rather than uniform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of noise filtering by introducing multiple register settings with different filtering strengths. By adjusting these parameters dynamically based on measured SNR and texture KPI values, the system optimizes the balance between noise reduction and texture preservation, transforming the fixed-parameter conventional approach into a variable-parameter adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If noise filtering is increased, then noise is reduced, but image quality deteriorates due to texture loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that measures both SNR and texture KPI values, then uses these measurements to adjust register settings. This closed-loop control ensures that noise filtering is optimized without compromising image quality, as the system continuously monitors and responds to actual image characteristics rather than applying fixed filtering regardless of outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts filtering parameters based on measured performance metrics, changing the strength of noise filtering dynamically. When texture preservation metrics indicate degradation, the system reduces filtering strength; when noise levels are problematic, it increases filtering. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by making filtering intensity conditional on actual image quality outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If register settings are optimized for noise reduction, then noise is reduced, but texture preservation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidtexture information
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces multiple register settings with different parameter configurations for noise filtering. By selecting and adjusting these parameters based on measured SNR and texture KPI values, the system optimizes the balance between noise reduction and texture information preservation, transforming single-parameter optimization into multi-parameter balanced optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects among different register settings based on real-time image characteristics and measured performance metrics. This dynamic selection allows the camera to adapt to varying lighting conditions and scene content, preserving texture information when important while reducing noise when possible, thereby resolving the information loss contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10368063B2Optical test device for a vehicle camera and testing method
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10368063B2 patent drawing
  • US10368063B2 patent drawing
  • US10368063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of testing a camera for vision system for a vehicle includes providing a camera configured for mounting and use on a vehicle. The camera is operable at selected ones of a plurality of register settings. A test pattern is disposed in the field of view of the camera and at least two frames of image data are captured with the camera using different register settings having noise filtering at a respective one of at least two levels between a maximum noise filtering and a minimum noise filtering. The signal to noise ratio is measured for each of the at least two frames of captured image data. A texture value is measured for each of the at least two frames of captured image data. A compromise is selected between noise reduction and texture preservation.