Camera-Based Vehicle Detection Using Solid Angle Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle detection systems using coils are prone to incorrect detection of non-metallic objects and are costly to install and maintain, as they require burial in the ground, and can mistakenly identify humans as vehicles due to the lack of distinction between vehicles and humans.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle detection device that uses a combination of first and second signals to determine if a subject object is a vehicle, based on distance and solid angle measurements, without relying on coils, allowing for accurate differentiation between vehicles and other objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coils are used for vehicle detection, then detection reliability is improved, but installation complexity and cost increase due to ground burial requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical coil-based detection system with a camera-based optical detection system. The camera captures images of vehicles, and the system processes these images to detect vehicle presence and movement, eliminating the need for ground burial and complex coil installation while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a camera as an intermediary device between the vehicle and the detection system. Instead of directly detecting metallic objects with coils, the camera captures visual information about vehicles, which is then processed to determine vehicle presence and movement, simplifying installation while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If coils are used for vehicle detection, then vehicle detection capability is improved, but maintenance cost and effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle detection capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical coil system with an electronic camera-based system. Cameras are more durable, require no ground burial, and can be easily replaced or calibrated if issues arise, significantly reducing maintenance effort compared to coil systems that require excavation and precise positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If coil-based detection is used, then metallic object detection is improved, but false detection of non-vehicle objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetallic object detectionVSAvoidfalse detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic image processing to distinguish vehicles from other objects. By analyzing sequential images and detecting movement patterns characteristic of vehicles (wheel rotation, body movement), the system can differentiate vehicles from stationary metallic objects or non-vehicle moving objects, reducing false detections while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional coil detection to two-dimensional image analysis. The camera captures spatial and temporal information across multiple dimensions, allowing the system to analyze vehicle shape, size, movement patterns, and position changes over time, thereby distinguishing vehicles from other objects more reliably than coil-based metallic detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Length of stationary object

If microwave-based detection is used, then detection range is improved, but inability to distinguish vehicles from humans causes incorrect detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidobject classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent analyzes dynamic movement patterns in sequential images to distinguish vehicles from humans. Vehicles exhibit characteristic movement patterns such as wheel rotation, suspension movement, and larger displacement distances, which differ from human walking patterns. This dynamic analysis maintains long detection range while achieving accurate object classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds temporal and spatial dimension analysis to the detection process. By processing sequences of images and analyzing movement trajectories, speed, acceleration, and object dimensions over time, the system can classify objects as vehicles or humans based on their movement characteristics, maintaining long detection range while achieving high classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10274586B2Vehicle detection device, vehicle gate system, and method of controlling vehicle detection device
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 OPTEX CO LTD
  • US10274586B2 patent drawing
  • US10274586B2 patent drawing
  • US10274586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle detection device includes: a first signal obtaining section which obtains a first signal corresponding to a distance to a subject object; a second signal obtaining section which obtains a second signal corresponding to a solid angle formed by the subject object; and a vehicle determining section which determines, based on the first and second signals, that the subject object is a vehicle, in a case where an actual size of the subject object is equal to or greater than a predetermined size.