Can Combustor with Annular Burners for Gas Turbine Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional can-annular combustors in gas turbines face challenges in operability, serviceability, and environmental performance, particularly in reducing NOx and CO emissions, and require cost-effective designs that enhance flame stability and operational robustness.

Innovation Solution

A can combustor design featuring a cylindrical casing with up to four premixed burners arranged in an annular pattern, each equipped with a conical swirl generator and mixing tube, utilizing co- and counter-swirl arrangements, multi-stage fuel supply, and varying burner geometries to reduce thermoacoustic instabilities and emissions, eliminating the central burner for cost savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional can-combustor design with a central burner and more than five annular burners is used, then the combustor provides stable combustion, but the number of burners increases cost and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidnumber of burners
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the central burner from the conventional combustor design, extracting only the necessary annular burners (maximally four) to achieve stable combustion. This reduction in burner count directly addresses the contradiction by lowering device complexity while maintaining combustion stability through optimized annular burner arrangement and multi-stage fuel supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having a central burner surrounded by annular burners, the patent inverts the arrangement by using only annular burners without a central element. This inversion simplifies the overall structure and reduces the number of components while still achieving the desired combustion performance through the annular configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If premixed burners with conical swirl generators and multiple air inlet slots are used, then NOx emissions are reduced, but burner design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx emissionsVSAvoidburner design
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs premixed burners with conical swirl generators featuring multiple air inlet slots, which fundamentally changes the mixing parameters of fuel and air. This parameter change enables complete premixing before combustion, significantly reducing NOx emissions. The standardized conical swirl generator design with varying slot configurations balances the reduction in harmful emissions with controlled design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If burners are arranged with different swirl directions (co-swirl and counter-swirl), then flame stability and operational robustness are enhanced, but the complexity of swirl generator configuration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame stabilityVSAvoidswirl generator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the swirl generator configuration by implementing both co-swirl and counter-swirl directions among the annular burners. This asymmetric arrangement enhances flame stability and operational robustness by creating more complex flow patterns that resist instability. The selective application of different swirl directions optimizes combustion performance while managing configuration complexity through purposeful asymmetry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Ease of manufacture

If the number of burners is limited to maximally four per can, then cost savings are achieved, but the challenge of maintaining combustion stability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost savingsVSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the combustion function into maximally four annular burners, combining multiple functions into fewer components. By eliminating the central burner and optimizing the annular burners with multi-stage fuel supply and conical swirl generators, the design achieves cost savings while maintaining combustion stability through the consolidated burner arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key combustion parameters through premixed burners with conical swirl generators and multi-stage fuel supply, enabling stable combustion with fewer burners. These parameter changes in fuel-air mixing and injection timing allow maximally four burners to achieve the combustion stability traditionally requiring more burners, thus reducing cost while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves reduced emissions, improved flame stability, and a wider operating range with lower NOx and CO emissions, enhanced burner communication, and reduced sensitivity to combustion dynamics, leading to longer turbine part lifetimes and cost savings.

Implementation Method 1

each of said burners has a conical swirl generator and a mixing tube to induce a swirl flow of said fuel/air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirl flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

conical swirl generator and a mixing tube to induce a swirl flow of said fuel/air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing:

Implementation Method 3

burners extending in an upstream direction from said front panel and having a burner exit, supported by this front panel, for supplying a fuel/air mixture into a combustion zone inside the can casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10422535B2Can combustor for a can-annular combustor arrangement in a gas turbine
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 ANSALDO ENERGIA SWITZERLAND AG
  • US10422535B2 patent drawing
  • US10422535B2 patent drawing
  • US10422535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a can-combustor for a can-annular combustor arrangement in a gas turbine. The can combustor includes an essentially cylindrical casing with an axially upstream front panel and an axially downstream outlet end. The can combustor further includes a number of premixed burners, extending in an upstream direction from said front panel and having a burner exit, supported by this front panel, for supplying a fuel/air mixture into a combustion zone inside the casing. Up to four premixed burners are attached to the front panel in a substantially annular array. Each burner has a conical swirl generator and a mixing tube to induce a swirl flow of said fuel/air mixture.