Cancellation Circuit for Full-Duplex Self-Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Full-duplex wireless communication systems face significant challenges in reducing self-interference when operating at the same frequency for both transmission and reception, rendering them ineffective in receiving desired signals.

Innovation Solution

A cancellation circuit with multiple delay and attenuation paths, a combiner, and a subtractor is used to construct and subtract a signal representative of the self-interference, employing variable attenuators and sinc functions to optimize interference cancellation, along with a splitter, balun, isolator, and processing engine to enhance signal quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If full-duplex communication operates at the same frequency for both transmission and reception, then spectral efficiency is improved, but self-interference increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidself-interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the self-interference cancellation into multiple delay paths (N paths where N≥2), with each path processing a different time segment of the transmit signal. This segmentation allows the system to handle the interference across multiple time windows, effectively reducing the overall self-interference while maintaining full-duplex operation at the same frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing the transmit signal through multiple delay and attenuation paths before it combines with the received signal. The controller adjusts attenuation levels in advance based on estimated self-interference characteristics, allowing the cancellation circuit to proactively reduce interference before it corrupts the desired receive signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If multiple delay and attenuation paths are used to reduce self-interference, then interference cancellation performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-interference reductionVSAvoidcancellation circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing the cancellation circuit with N reusable delay and attenuation paths that can handle multiple interference scenarios. The same architectural block (delay element + variable attenuator) is replicated N times, allowing the system to reduce complexity by using identical modular units rather than designing separate complex circuits for each path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics through the controller that dynamically adjusts the attenuation levels of the N variable attenuators based on real-time estimates of self-interference characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize interference cancellation for different channel conditions and transmit signal patterns, improving performance without requiring a fixed complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If attenuation levels are dynamically adjusted based on self-interference estimates, then interference cancellation accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol block complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the controller to continuously monitor and estimate self-interference characteristics, then adjusting the attenuation levels of the N variable attenuators based on these estimates. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing interference conditions and maintain high cancellation accuracy without requiring overly complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies copying by creating N copies of the delayed and attenuated transmit signal paths, where each copy represents an estimate of the self-interference at different time delays. These copied signals are then combined and subtracted from the received signal, allowing the system to accurately model and cancel interference without requiring complex real-time processing of the actual interference waveform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9331737B2Systems and methods for cancelling interference using multiple attenuation delays
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US9331737B2 patent drawing
  • US9331737B2 patent drawing
  • US9331737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication device includes, in part, at least one antenna for receiving or transmitting a signal, and a cancelation circuit adapted to cancel or reduce the self-interference signal. The cancelation circuit includes, in part, a control block, N delay and attenuation paths, a combiner, and a subtractor. Each path includes a delay element and a variable attenuator whose attenuation level varies in response to a control signal generated by the control block. Each path receives a sample of the transmit signal and generates a delayed and attenuated (weighted) version of the sample signal. The combiner combines the N delayed and weighted versions of the sample signal to construct a signal representative of the self-interference signal. The subtractor subtracts the constructed signal from the received signal thereby the cancel or reduce the self-interference signal therefrom.