Candidate-Cell Power Prioritization for Uplink Threshold Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power prioritization rules in wireless communications systems fail to adequately account for uplink transmissions to non-serving cells, leading to inefficiencies and potential exceedance of maximum power thresholds.

Innovation Solution

Implement power prioritization rules that consider both serving and candidate cells, allocating transmit power to ensure total UE transmit power for all cells does not exceed the maximum threshold, using RRC signaling to manage power allocation for uplink transmissions such as PRACH, PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing power prioritization rules are used that only consider serving cells, then power allocation for serving cell transmissions is simplified, but total UE transmit power may exceed maximum thresholds and mobility efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower threshold complianceVSAvoidpower allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power allocation process is segmented into two distinct stages: first allocating power to serving cell transmissions, then separately allocating power to candidate cell transmissions. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently while ensuring total power compliance, resolving the contradiction between simplified allocation and threshold compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity performs preliminary power allocation for serving cells before the UE attempts to allocate power for candidate cells. This preliminary action establishes a power budget that the UE must respect, ensuring that candidate cell allocations will not cause total power to exceed maximum thresholds while maintaining relatively simple UE-side processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If power is allocated to candidate cells without considering total power constraints, then mobility signaling efficiency improves, but power threshold compliance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility signaling efficiencyVSAvoidpower threshold compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity provides feedback to the UE regarding the allocated serving cell power and the remaining power budget. This feedback mechanism enables the UE to allocate candidate cell power while ensuring total power compliance, thereby maintaining both mobility signaling efficiency and power threshold compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity performs preliminary power allocation for serving cells before the UE attempts to allocate power for candidate cells. This preliminary action establishes a power budget that the UE must respect, ensuring that candidate cell allocations will not cause total power to exceed maximum thresholds while maintaining relatively simple UE-side processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If power prioritization rules exclude candidate cells, then UE processing complexity is reduced, but mobility management effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE processing simplicityVSAvoidmobility management effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power allocation process is segmented into two distinct stages: first allocating power to serving cell transmissions, then separately allocating power to candidate cell transmissions. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently while ensuring total power compliance, resolving the contradiction between simplified allocation and threshold compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity acts as an intermediary that provides power allocation guidance to the UE. By supplying pre-calculated power budgets and priorities, the network entity enables the UE to maintain simple processing while effectively managing power across both serving and candidate cells, thus improving mobility management without significantly increasing UE complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12432666B2Power prioritization including candidate cells
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12432666B2 patent drawing
  • US12432666B2 patent drawing
  • US12432666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for power prioritization including physical random access channel (PRACH) on candidate cells. An example method, performed at a user equipment (UE), includes allocating transmit power for a transmission of a signal to a candidate cell based on a power prioritization rule that considers UE transmit power for transmissions on the candidate cell and at least one other cell, and transmitting the signal to the candidate cell according to the allocation.