Caninized Anti-PD-L1 Antibody for Canine Checkpoint Blockade

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies for cancer in humans and canines have limited response rates (10-40%) and rodent models are not predictive for canine immune checkpoint blockade therapy, necessitating an animal model that can optimize checkpoint inhibitor treatment in humans and effectively treat canine cancers.

Innovation Solution

Development of a caninized antibody or antigen binding fragment that specifically binds canine PD-L1, comprising specific amino acid and nucleotide sequences, which can inhibit the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction in canines, and is administered in therapeutically effective amounts to treat invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rodent models are used to study immune checkpoint blockade therapy, then cancer research can be conducted, but the models are not predictive for canine therapy and lack critical features for studying bladder cancer molecular subtypes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictivity for canine therapyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a caninized mouse model by replacing the mouse PD-L1 gene with the canine PD-L1 gene sequence. This copying approach allows the model to accurately replicate canine immune checkpoint biology while maintaining the ease of use of rodent models, thereby resolving the contradiction between model simplicity and predictive accuracy for canine therapy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies a fundamental parameter of the mouse model by substituting the murine PD-L1 genetic sequence with the canine PD-L1 sequence. This parameter change transforms the model from being non-predictive for canine therapy to highly predictive, while retaining the advantages of rodent model complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy is administered to cancer patients, then immune response is enhanced, but response rates remain limited at 10-40%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidresponse rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a caninized anti-PD-L1 antibody as an intermediary therapeutic agent that specifically targets the canine PD-L1/PD-1 interaction. This specialized antibody serves as a more effective mediator of immune checkpoint blockade in canine patients, potentially improving response rates beyond current human therapy levels by addressing species-specific biological differences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the therapeutic approach by developing species-specific antibodies (caninized for canine patients) rather than using human antibodies in canine patients. This segmentation allows for optimized therapeutic efficacy in each species by accounting for immunological differences, thereby improving overall response rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250277039A1Canine PD-l1 antibody, antigen binding fragments thereof, and methods of use thereof
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US20250277039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277039A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Caninized antibodies and antigen binding fragments thereof are provided that bind programmed death ligand 1 in a canine subject. Methods of treating cancer in a canine subject using the caninized antibodies and/or antigen binding fragments are also provided, as are methods for predicting and modeling anti-cancer activity of a test compound in a subject.