Fuel Vapor Canister Purging and Sensor Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle evaporative emission systems face challenges in thoroughly purging fuel vapors, particularly heavy ends, from the fuel vapor canister, leading to bleed emissions and inefficient energy use, with existing methods like hydrocarbon sensors and electrical heating posing reliability and power consumption issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the activation of a canister heating element within the fuel vapor canister to promote desorption of hydrocarbon vapors, where the canister is sealed initially to heat and then vented to route vapors into a vent line for monitoring by a hydrocarbon sensor, allowing for the diagnosis of both the heating element and sensor functionality while conserving energy by selectively purging light and heavy ends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electrical heating is applied to the fuel vapor canister to promote desorption of hydrocarbon vapors, then desorption effectiveness is improved, but electrical power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesorption effectivenessVSAvoidelectrical power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies heating selectively based on canister temperature and hydrocarbon type. Light ends are purged using ambient temperature air flow, while heavy ends require targeted heating. This local quality approach ensures heating is applied only where and when necessary, improving desorption effectiveness for heavy ends without unnecessarily consuming electrical power for light ends purging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the temperature parameter dynamically based on the purging phase. During light ends purging, the canister remains at ambient temperature. During heavy ends purging, the heating element activates to raise the canister temperature. This parameter change strategy optimizes the balance between desorption effectiveness and power consumption by matching temperature conditions to the specific hydrocarbon being purged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the hydrocarbon sensor is positioned to detect vapors only at breakthrough, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates as the sensor may never detect vapors until saturation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor positioning simplicityVSAvoidvapor detection timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary purging actions to concentrate hydrocarbon vapors before the sensor needs to detect them. By actively purging the canister and routing vapors through the vent line where the sensor is positioned, the system ensures that sufficient vapor concentration reaches the sensor in advance, enabling reliable detection without requiring the sensor to be positioned at multiple locations or using complex detection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the canister is purged using only intake manifold vacuum, then device complexity is minimized, but productivity decreases as heavy ends cannot be effectively desorbed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurge system simplicityVSAvoidpurge completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The purging process is segmented into two distinct phases: light ends purging using only intake manifold vacuum, and heavy ends purging that adds heating element activation. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity for the majority of purging operations (light ends constitute most vapor volume) while adding targeted complexity only when needed for heavy ends, thereby improving overall purge completeness without excessively increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial heating action rather than continuous heating. The heating element is activated only during heavy ends purging phases when intake manifold vacuum alone is insufficient. This partial action approach ensures complete purging of all hydrocarbon types while avoiding excessive energy consumption that would result from continuous heating, thus improving productivity without disproportionate increase in energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If the canister heater is activated continuously to ensure complete desorption, then purging completeness is improved, but energy waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurging completenessVSAvoidunnecessary heating energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heating element operates periodically rather than continuously, activated only during specific heavy ends purging phases when required for effective desorption. Between these periodic activations, the heating element remains off, allowing the system to achieve complete purging of heavy ends while avoiding continuous energy consumption. This periodic action pattern optimizes the balance between purging completeness and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures thorough purging of both hydrocarbon light and heavy ends, conserves battery power, and reliably assesses the functioning of the canister heating element and hydrocarbon sensor, reducing undesired emissions and improving the fuel vapor canister's adsorption capacity.

Implementation Method 1

activation of a canister heating element within the fuel vapor canister to promote desorption of hydrocarbon vapors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

promote desorption of hydrocarbon vapors, where the canister is sealed initially to heat and then vented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 3

desorption of stored fuel vapors from the adsorbent material in the canister, regenerating the adsorbent material for further fuel vapor adsorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS10451010B2Systems and methods for diagnosing components in a vehicle evaporative emissions system
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10451010B2 patent drawing
  • US10451010B2 patent drawing
  • US10451010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for conducting a canister purging operation and for rationalizing components of a vehicle evaporative emission system. In one example, after completion of a refueling event, a first fuel vapor canister purge operation is conducted to desorb hydrocarbon light ends from the fuel vapor canister, and subsequently the canister is heated to desorb hydrocarbon heavy ends from the canister, which are routed to a hydrocarbon sensor to rationalize the hydrocarbon sensor, before being purged to engine intake in a second purging operation. In this way, a fuel vapor storage canister may be thoroughly cleaned of hydrocarbon light ends and hydrocarbon heavy ends, while additionally indicating whether a canister heating element, and a hydrocarbon sensor positioned between the canister and atmosphere, are functioning as desired.