Canted Coil Springs With Alternating Coils For Inner Perimeter Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Canted coil springs with constant coil cross sections face limitations in miniaturization and adjustment of force and conductive properties due to unmodifiable spacing and wire cross-section constraints, particularly in applications requiring specific geometric parameters.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates alternating coils with different dimensions and configurations, allowing for improved spacing and reduced inner perimeter without losing canted characteristics, enabling better flexibility and performance in applications like electromagnetic interference shielding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If spacing between coils is increased to meet force and conductive requirements, then force and conductive properties are improved, but the canted characteristics are lost due to fewer coils per unit length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce propertiesVSAvoidcanted characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the coil cross-sectional dimensions along the spring length. Different sections have different wire diameters or coil spacing, allowing local optimization of force properties in high-stress areas while maintaining canted characteristics in other sections. This resolves the contradiction by making the spring structure non-uniform, where specific regions can be designed for maximum force output without compromising the overall canted geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If wire cross section is increased to improve force properties, then force capacity is improved, but the minimum ring inner perimeter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce capacityVSAvoidminimum ring inner perimeter
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by using variable wire cross-sections along the spring length. Larger wire diameters are used only in specific high-stress regions where force capacity is critical, while other sections use smaller wire diameters. This allows the spring to achieve high force capacity locally without increasing the overall minimum ring inner perimeter, as the larger cross-sections are confined to specific zones rather than the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Volume of moving object

If miniaturization is pursued to reduce component size, then device size is reduced, but geometric parameters reach limits and further refinements are no longer possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent sizeVSAvoidgeometric parameter refinement
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by making the spring geometry variable rather than constant. Key parameters such as wire diameter, coil spacing, and coil dimensions are allowed to change along the length of the spring. This provides continuous adjustment capability even in miniaturized components, allowing geometric parameters to be optimized for specific performance requirements without being constrained by fixed minimum values. The variable parameter approach enables further refinement beyond what is possible with constant-cross-section springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If constant coil cross section is used to simplify manufacturing, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but flexibility in adjusting force and conductive properties is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidflexibility in adjusting properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing local quality through variable cross-sections. While this does increase manufacturing complexity compared to constant cross-section springs, the variation is achieved through controlled changes in specific regions rather than continuous complexity. Modern manufacturing processes can efficiently produce variable cross-section springs, and the resulting design flexibility in adjusting force and conductive properties provides significant performance benefits that justify the moderate increase in manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10668521B2Canted coil springs and assemblies and related methods
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 BAL SEAL ENG CO INC
  • US10668521B2 patent drawing
  • US10668521B2 patent drawing
  • US10668521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Canted coil spring rings each with a first plurality of coils having first coil major and minor axes; a second plurality of coils each having second coil major and minor axes; the coils of the first plurality of coils alternating with the coils of the second plurality of coils according to an alternating pattern. The spring rings having inner and outer perimeters and wherein the inner perimeter of the spring ring is defined by at least said first plurality of coils. The resulting configuration of the spring ring has improved spacing along the inner perimeter, among others, with respect to a similar canted coil spring ring having a constant coil cross section, such as a coil length with all similar coils.