Cantilever Stabilizer Bar Bushing With Pre-Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cantilevered stabilizer bar bushing assemblies face challenges in achieving high articulation angles (>30 degrees) and high radial stiffness (>10,000 N/mm) without slippage or noise, while prior designs often compromise on fatigue life, noise, or manufacturing complexity.

Innovation Solution

A cantilevered bushing assembly with a bracket featuring a pocket and outer cans with anti-rotation lobes and radially-outwardly bulging keyways, combined with post-vulcanization bonding of a rubber buffer to the stabilizer bar, allowing pre-compression and minimizing shrinkage, and embedding a rate plate within the rubber buffer to enhance radial and torsional stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a cantilevered bushing assembly is used to achieve high articulation angles (>30 degrees), then the freedom of motion is improved, but slippage and noise occur at the metal-to-rubber interface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreedom of motionVSAvoidinterface stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rubber buffer is pre-compressed during assembly to establish sufficient friction at the metal-to-rubber interface before operation begins. This preliminary compression ensures that the friction force is adequate to prevent slippage during high articulation movements, resolving the contradiction between freedom of motion and interface stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the compression parameter of the rubber buffer to optimize the friction coefficient at the metal-to-rubber interface. By adjusting the pre-compression force, the system achieves sufficient friction to prevent slippage while maintaining the required articulation range, thus resolving the contradiction between motion freedom and interface reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If bracket mounting bolts clamp the rubber buffer directly to achieve sufficient friction, then slippage is prevented, but the design cannot be applied to packaging environments that prohibit conventional attachments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction resistanceVSAvoidmounting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rubber buffer is pre-compressed during assembly to establish sufficient friction at the metal-to-rubber interface without requiring conventional bracket mounting bolts. This preliminary compression action enables the design to achieve reliable friction resistance while adapting to packaging environments that prohibit traditional attachment methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The design extracts the clamping function from the bracket mounting bolts and relocates it to the bushing assembly itself through pre-compression of the rubber buffer. This extraction allows the system to maintain sufficient friction resistance without relying on conventional bracket attachments, thereby improving adaptability to restricted packaging environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If the stabilizer bar is supported directly to the vehicle frame with rigid mounting, then the force transfer is improved, but the stabilizer bar binds up leading to fatigue fractures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transferVSAvoidfatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rubber buffer acts as a flexible element between the stabilizer bar and the mounting bracket, allowing the stabilizer bar to move freely during suspension travel. This flexibility prevents binding and fatigue fractures while the rubber buffer still transfers the necessary forces, resolving the contradiction between force transfer and fatigue resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the mounting configuration from rigid direct attachment to flexible rubber-buffered mounting. This parameter change in the mounting stiffness allows the stabilizer bar to accommodate suspension movements without binding, preventing fatigue fractures while maintaining adequate force transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If adhesive bonding is used at the metal-to-rubber interface to prevent slippage, then torsional stiffness is maintained, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorsional stiffnessVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The design uses a disposable rubber buffer component that is pre-compressed during assembly to provide the necessary friction and torsional stiffness without requiring adhesive bonding. This approach maintains torsional stiffness while significantly simplifying manufacturing by eliminating the adhesive bonding process and associated complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The design replaces the chemical bonding mechanism (adhesive) with a mechanical friction-based system through pre-compression of the rubber buffer. This substitution maintains torsional stiffness through friction forces while eliminating the need for adhesive bonding, thereby simplifying manufacturing and reducing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves high articulation and radial stiffness with reduced noise and improved fatigue life, enabling modular assembly and adaptability to different stabilizer bar sizes, while maintaining a compact package envelope and efficient manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

The elastic nature of the rubber buffer prevents the bar 20 from binding up which could otherwise lead to fatigue fractures or reduced efficiency of the bar 20

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

Rubber buffers in the bushings 22 are usually used at these mounting points to allow some freedom of motion and act as bearings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 3

Some applications use an adhesive bond at the metal-to-rubber interface to prevent slip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20230076305A1Stabilizer bar bushing
Publication Date: 2023.03.09 ZHONGLI NORTH AMERICA
  • US20230076305A1 patent drawing
  • US20230076305A1 patent drawing
  • US20230076305A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cantilever bushing assembly anchors the central torsional section of a vehicular stabilizer bar in a cantilevered manner relative to a vehicle understructure. The bushing assembly comprises a bracket having a pocket centered on a pocket axis that coincides with a longitudinal axis of the stabilizer bar. Two plastic outer cans are cooperatively slidable into the pocket. Each outer can has an anti-rotation lobe received in respective keyways formed in the pocket. A rubber buffer is bonded to each outer can. Each rubber buffer has a frusto-cylindrical inner bearing surface that forms an arcuate portion of an interior bushing diameter. The inner bearing surface is post-vulcanization bonded to the central torsional section of the stabilizer bar. An arched rate plate is embedded within each rubber buffer. The rubber buffers compress in the area of the inner bearing surfaces and constrict about the central torsional section of the stabilizer bar.