Cantilever Wine Holder Frame for Stable Table Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cantilever-style wine bucket and bottle holders suffer from structural instability under load, leading to potential failure and damage to table surfaces due to localized force distribution and bending of support rings, which increases the likelihood of the holder failing over time and damaging the table.

Innovation Solution

A unitary frame with a holder and mount unified as a single piece, featuring a ring-shaped holder with laterally spaced supports and crossbars, and a cantilever-style mount with upper and lower contact bars that distribute the load across a larger surface area, providing stability and reducing the moment of force on the table.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single ring holder is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the structural stability deteriorates due to bending under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholder structureVSAvoidholder stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The holder is divided into multiple structural components: an upper ring, a lower ring, and multiple support arms connecting them. This segmentation distributes the load across multiple elements rather than concentrating it on a single ring, preventing bending and structural failure while maintaining relative simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The holder transitions from a two-dimensional single ring to a three-dimensional structure with vertical separation between upper and lower rings, connected by support arms. This adds a vertical dimension that creates a more rigid spatial framework, enhancing stability without significantly increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If a three-point anchor attachment is used, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the harmful factors increase due to localized forces on table surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemount attachmentVSAvoidtable surface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting attachment is segmented into multiple contact points (at least three, preferably more) distributed across the table surface rather than concentrating force at a single point. This distributes the localized forces, reducing the risk of damaging soft wood or glass table surfaces while maintaining ease of manufacture through simple attachment geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mount distributes forces across both the vertical dimension (through the cantilever structure) and horizontal dimension (across multiple contact points on the table). This multi-dimensional force distribution reduces localized stress on the table surface while keeping the attachment structure simple to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If the contact bar is positioned closer to the holder, then the device complexity is reduced, but the stability deteriorates due to increased moment of force on the table

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemount structureVSAvoidmount stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The cantilever structure is designed with the contact bar positioned at an optimal distance from the holder to preemptively reduce the moment of force on the table. By carefully selecting the contact bar position during design, the structure pre-balances the forces before loading, enhancing stability without requiring complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-generated harmful factors

If padding is added to the contact bar, then the harmful factors to table surface are reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetable surface protectionVSAvoidmount structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding complex padding structures throughout the mount, the solution applies a simple protective coating or thin padding layer only at the specific contact points with the table surface. This localized approach protects the table from damage while adding minimal complexity to the overall device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9398824B2Cantilever-style wine bucket and bottle holder
Publication Date: 2016.07.26 JEK2
  • US9398824B2 patent drawing
  • US9398824B2 patent drawing
  • US9398824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cantilever-style wine server for mounting to a table has a unitary frame composed of shaped metal bars, such as shaped rods with circular cross-sections. The frame includes a holder that serves as a receptacle for a wine bucket, insulator, and/or a bottle, and a mount/handle that serves as both a cantilever mount to the side of a table and as a handle to transport the server. The holder and mount/handle are unified as a single frame, such as by multiple welds. The frame has a flat base, enabling the server (even when fully loaded) to be set down on a flat surface. A removable cover may center a wine bottle in the holder.