Cantilevered Leaf Spring Shock Mitigation for Marine Seat Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shock mitigation systems for high-speed watercraft are complex, costly, and primarily designed for vertical shock absorption, failing to effectively mitigate lateral impacts, which can lead to spinal injuries and are often heavy due to the use of marine-grade stainless steel and multiple pivot points, resulting in increased weight and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A shock mitigation apparatus utilizing cantilevered leaf springs with freely articulating pivots at one end, allowing for reduced pivot points, increased flexibility, and the use of lightweight materials, enabling absorption of shocks in three planes of movement and axes of rotation, with adjustable aperture for tunable compliance and optional damping systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple pivot points and rigid arms are used for shock absorption, then vertical shock mitigation is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical shock transmissionVSAvoidnumber of pivot points and components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential shock absorption function from complex multi-pivot mechanisms and implements it through a single rigid arm with one pivot point. The rigid arm directly connects the seat to the base structure, eliminating the need for multiple intermediate pivot points while maintaining vertical shock mitigation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using flexible arms with multiple pivots to achieve shock absorption, the patent inverts the approach by using a rigid arm that maintains structural integrity while absorbing shock through its single pivot connection and inherent rigidity, thereby simplifying the overall mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If marine-grade stainless steel and multiple components are used, then reliability in marine environment is improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability in marine environmentVSAvoidweight of shock absorption system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes unnecessary components such as multiple pivot points, separate springs, and complex mounting mechanisms from the design. By retaining only the essential rigid arm with a single pivot, the system achieves reliable shock absorption with significantly reduced weight and material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid arm serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support, absorbs vertical shocks, and maintains seat positioning. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate components that would otherwise be required to achieve each function individually, reducing overall weight while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If parallel leaf springs with fixed clamps are used, then shock absorption is improved, but manufacturing cost and weight increase due to high-stress materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock transmissionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and material requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the shock absorption function from complex parallel leaf spring assemblies with fixed clamps and implements it through a simpler rigid arm mechanism. This eliminates the need for expensive high-stress materials and complex clamp assemblies while maintaining effective shock mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid arm design uses simpler, more cost-effective materials compared to the expensive titanium and heavy stainless steel required for parallel leaf spring systems. The simplified structure reduces manufacturing complexity and material costs while providing adequate service life for the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus reduces the transmission of shock forces to occupants, preventing excessive movement and potential injuries, while minimizing weight, cost, and complexity by using fewer components and materials, such as injection-molded plastics, and providing adjustable stiffness and damping for improved comfort and safety.

Implementation Method 1

each pair of leaf springs is cantilevered at one end and pivoted at a distal end thereof, and wherein the pivoted end is free to articulate upon flexure of the leaf spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

optional damping systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP3169582B1A shock mitigation apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.11.20 ZWAAN PAUL FRANCIS
  • EP3169582B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3169582B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3169582B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Described herein is a shock mitigation apparatus. The shock mitigation apparatus may be utilised in a marine environment, able to absorb shocks transmitted to a seat system from a structure to which the seat is affixed. The shock mitigation apparatus includes at least one leaf spring wherein the leaf spring is cantilevered at one end and pivoted at a distal end thereof, and wherein the pivoted end is free to articulate upon flexure of the leaf spring.