Rotary Cap Assembly Spindle Alignment and Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machinery for assembling plastic caps, such as those for Tetra-Pak containers, is complex and costly, prone to misalignment, and results in high waste due to inaccurate cutting and coupling processes.

Innovation Solution

A device with a simplified rotary assembly system that uses spindles with a cutting mechanism and positioning apparatus to precisely couple caps to base supports, reducing the need for multiple cutters and optimizing the cutting process by using a single cutting mechanism that can work with each spindle, enhancing precision and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a cutter is placed on each spindle to perform precise cuts, then cutting precision is improved, but device complexity and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple cutters into a single cutter that serves all spindles. The single cutter is positioned to work with multiple spindles sequentially, eliminating the need for individual cutters on each spindle. This merging approach maintains cutting precision while significantly reducing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single cutter is designed to perform the cutting function for multiple spindles, making it a universal component. The cutter can service different spindles in sequence, providing multi-functionality that replaces the need for dedicated cutters on each spindle, thereby simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple cutters are used on each spindle, then cutting precision is improved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the function of multiple expensive cutters into a single cutter that services all spindles. This consolidation dramatically reduces the number of cutting components needed, lowering both initial production costs and ongoing maintenance expenses while preserving cutting precision through proper positioning and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having multiple physical cutters, the system uses a single cutter that is repeatedly positioned and reused for each spindle. This copying approach, where one cutter performs the function of many, reduces material costs and simplifies manufacturing while maintaining the required cutting precision through controlled positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If a rotary mechanism with multiple spindles is used, then productivity is improved, but misalignment between caps and supports occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates positioning apparatus that monitors and adjusts the position of caps and base supports in real-time. This feedback mechanism detects misalignment and makes corrective adjustments, ensuring precise coupling between caps and supports while maintaining high productivity through the rotary multi-spindle configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic positioning adjustments during the coupling process. The positioning apparatus can adaptively adjust the position of components as they move through the rotary mechanism, allowing the system to maintain precision despite the dynamic, rotating nature of the high-productivity machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If mechanical connections between spindle and actuators are made robust, then reliability is improved, but cutting accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical connection reliabilityVSAvoidcutting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical connections between spindles and actuators with alternative mechanisms that reduce mechanical play and improve accuracy. This substitution maintains reliable mechanical coupling while minimizing the inaccuracies that arise from long-term mechanical wear and connection issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11420859B2Device for assembling plastic objects
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 IMA IND MASCH AUTOMATICHE SPA
  • US11420859B2 patent drawing
  • US11420859B2 patent drawing
  • US11420859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for assembling plastic objects including caps for coupling to base support at least partially counter-shaped to the cap. The device includes at least part of an assembly line defining assembly path and assembly plane including the assembly path and plurality of spindles moveable along the assembly path by an apparatus and configured to controlledly pick up the caps, the spindles position and push the caps onto the base supports along the assembly path; positioning apparatus including first and second detectors, controller with auxiliary control system to translate and rotate spindles along directions perpendicular to assembly path and plane and third encoder to detect spindle orientation relative to assembly path. First detector to detect first orientation, second detector to detect second orientation and controller to detect first orientation and second orientation by detectors and operate auxiliary control system to align base support and cap.