Cap-Lining Machine Feed Assembly with Gravity and Pneumatic Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cap-lining machines face inefficiencies and safety hazards due to the deformation and jamming of softer, lighter caps in narrow channels, leading to production downtime and mechanical damage, and existing solutions fail to address the issue of liner waste and user safety effectively.

Innovation Solution

A cap-lining machine assembly featuring a track system with gates and sensors that positions caps for lining and sensing, using light, rigid gates and a photoelectric sensor to manage cap movement and prevent deformation, ensuring proper lining and reducing downtime and safety risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If caps are advanced through a narrow channel by a stuffer rod, then caps can be fed into the cap-lining machine, but the softer and lighter caps frequently deform and bind within the channel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecap feeding capabilityVSAvoidcap shape integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical stuffer rod system with a gravity feed system where caps move along a track by gravity. This eliminates the mechanical pushing action that caused deformation and binding of softer, lighter caps while maintaining continuous cap feeding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a puff of air mechanism to propel caps through the track. This pneumatic approach provides gentle, distributed force that moves caps without the concentrated mechanical pressure of a stuffer rod, preventing deformation and binding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Productivity

If a stuffer rod pushes caps down the track, then caps can be moved through the channel, but the speed with which the stuffer rod could push caps was inversely proportional to the number of caps to be fed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecap feeding rateVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The gravity feed system with pneumatic assistance enables continuous cap movement without the intermittent pushing cycles of a stuffer rod. Multiple caps can be fed simultaneously or in continuous sequence, eliminating the time loss associated with resetting and repositioning mechanical pushers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The track system divides the cap feeding process into discrete sections with gates at different positions. This segmentation allows independent control of cap flow at different stages, enabling continuous operation without system-wide interruptions when adjusting feed rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the cap supply ceases, then the cap-lining mechanism continues to punch and tamp liner inserts, but this wastes liner inserts and requires shutting down the entire machine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidliner insert waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates sensors that detect the presence or absence of caps in the track. This feedback system automatically signals the cap-lining mechanism to stop punching and tamping when no caps are available, preventing liner insert waste without requiring manual shutdown and restart.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects cap supply status and adjusts operation accordingly through the sensor-feedback mechanism. No manual intervention is needed to stop or restart the machine, eliminating downtime while preventing waste through automated response to supply conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of substance

If heavy, complex moving parts are used to stop liner paper feed when a cap is missing, then liner waste can be prevented, but safety hazards to users increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner insert waste preventionVSAvoiduser safety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy mechanical stopping mechanisms with a lightweight sensor-based control system. The sensors detect missing caps and automatically signal the control system to stop liner feed, eliminating the need for heavy moving parts that pose safety hazards while maintaining effective waste prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient, safe, and continuous cap lining with reduced downtime and mechanical damage, improving production efficiency and user safety by accurately positioning caps and preventing deformation.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor is provided for sensing the arrival of a cap at the sensing location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric sensing: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8561778B2Cap-lining machine feed assembly and method
Publication Date: 2013.10.22 KIERAN THOMAS G
  • US8561778B2 patent drawing
  • US8561778B2 patent drawing
  • US8561778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly for moving caps through a cap-lining machine includes a track for the downstream movement of the caps to a cap-lining location in the cap-lining machine. A first gate is mounted downstream from the cap-lining location for movement between first and second positions preventing and allowing downstream movement of the caps, respectively. A sensing location is formed in the track downstream from the cap-lining location. A second gate is mounted downstream from the sensing location for movement between first and second positions preventing and allowing downstream movement of the caps, respectively. The first gate moves to the first position in response to a sensor sensing the arrival of one of the caps at the sensing location, and the second gate moves to the second position in response to the first gate moving to the first position.