Cap Assembly With Pressure Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cap assemblies for vessels, particularly those made of plastic or glass, face issues with inadequate seal integrity, requiring high torques for proper sealing, leading to leakage and operator errors due to misalignment and uneven pressure application.

Innovation Solution

A cap assembly featuring a stopper with a polymer body and a rigid cap equipped with a pressure-based locking mechanism that engages the vessel under unidirectional force, providing a tamper evident feature to ensure secure sealing and prevent contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cap assemblies are used to close vessel openings, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but seal integrity is inadequate and leakage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoidcap assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cap assembly is divided into distinct functional components: a stopper component with sealing elements and a cap component with locking features. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall simplicity in manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stopper is nested within the cap structure, with the cap component enclosing the stopper component. This nested arrangement provides multiple sealing interfaces and locking mechanisms within a compact assembly, improving seal integrity without significantly increasing external dimensions or manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If high torques are applied to ensure proper sealing, then seal engagement is improved, but misalignment and uneven pressure application occur causing operator errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal engagementVSAvoidassembly precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cap assembly incorporates pre-formed alignment features including a centrally located opening in the cap and corresponding positioning elements on the stopper. These preliminary alignment structures guide the assembly process, ensuring proper alignment before final torque application, thereby preventing misalignment and uneven pressure distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism includes self-aligning features where the cap and stopper automatically center themselves during assembly through geometric constraints and tapered surfaces. This self-service alignment reduces dependence on operator precision and minimizes assembly errors even when torque application varies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If rapid torqueing is performed to speed up assembly, then productivity increases, but threading jumps and misalignment occur leading to failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidthreading engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap and stopper are pre-assembled with thread engagement features and alignment elements in place before final tightening. This preliminary configuration ensures that rapid torqueing applies force to already-aligned threads, preventing jumping and maintaining reliable engagement while enabling high-speed assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The threading interface incorporates modified thread profiles and engagement geometries that maintain secure fastening at higher torque application rates. These parameter changes allow the assembly to withstand rapid tightening without thread stripping or misalignment, thereby supporting increased productivity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If the cap assembly is tilted during assembly, then ease of insertion is improved, but uneven pressure application occurs causing seal failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidpressure distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap assembly incorporates asymmetric guiding features and tapered entry surfaces that accept tilted insertion but automatically redirect the assembly force toward a centered, aligned position. This asymmetric design allows easy initial insertion while ensuring that the final seated position achieves uniform pressure distribution across the sealing interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The assembly mechanism includes dynamic elements such as flexible sealing lips and spring-loaded locking features that adapt to insertion angles. These dynamic components accommodate tilted insertion movements while maintaining continuous contact and progressively distributing pressure evenly as the cap is fully seated, preventing seal failures despite initial misalignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11529641B2Cap assembly
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 SAINT GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP
  • US11529641B2 patent drawing
  • US11529641B2 patent drawing
  • US11529641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cap assembly for closing an opening in a vessel may include a stopper and a rigid cap adapted to fit over the stopper and onto a vessel. The stopper may include a polymer body adapted to fit an opening of the vessel and a tubular portion defining an internal passageway extending through the polymer body. The rigid cap may include a pressure based locking mechanism adapted to engage the vessel under a unidirectional force and a tamper evident feature.