Child Resistant Cap U-Channel Safety Component

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child-resistant safety caps do not effectively prevent children from accessing harmful substances in containers, as they can be inadvertently opened, posing a risk to child safety.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant cap with a U-channel safety component featuring an inner member with horizontal tracks and breaks, allowing an outer member to move through a U-channel path for secure opening, requiring a user to press down and rotate the outer member to align lugs with breaks, ensuring secure closure and preventing accidental opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional safety caps are used, then child safety is improved, but ease of operation for adults deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidease of opening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is divided into an inner cap and an outer cap that operate independently. The inner cap threads onto the container and remains fixed, while the outer cap rotates independently to open or close. This segmentation allows the outer cap to provide easy rotational operation for adults while the inner cap maintains secure engagement with the container, resolving the contradiction between child safety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outer cap acts as an intermediary between the user and the inner cap. Users interact with the outer cap for opening and closing operations, while the inner cap maintains the secure seal. This intermediary structure allows adults to easily operate the cap through simple rotation of the outer cap, while children cannot inadvertently open it due to the complex internal mechanism, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If child-resistant mechanisms are added, then child safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidcap structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the cap into separate inner and outer components with distinct functions, the complexity of the child-resistant mechanism is distributed across simple, modular parts rather than concentrated in a single complex assembly. The inner cap provides secure engagement while the outer cap provides easy operation, and their simple interaction achieves child resistance without requiring complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cap structure utilizes the natural threading mechanism and the weight/differential movement between inner and outer caps to achieve child resistance automatically. When a child pulls on the outer cap, the inner cap remains engaged with the container due to its threading and positioning, preventing opening without requiring additional locks or complex mechanisms. The structure serves its own safety function through its basic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8584902B2Child resistant cap with u-channel component
Publication Date: 2013.11.19 DEJONGE ASSOCIATES INC
  • US8584902B2 patent drawing
  • US8584902B2 patent drawing
  • US8584902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child resistant cap with a U-channel safety component includes an inner and an outer member. The inner member has sidewalls with two horizontal tracks, being an upper and a lower track. There in a top horizontal flange with breaks to permit movement of outer member inwardly projecting lugs therethrough, and a central horizontal flange with breaks to permit movement of inwardly projecting lugs from the lower track upwardly past the central horizontal break, past the upper track, and through the breaks of the upper track top horizontal flange. There are vertical stops that prevent the lugs from entering the break when in the upper track, and one stop adjacent one break on the lower track to permit lugs to enter the break when in the lower track. A user rotates the outer member to a position for movement to the lower track, rotates to a stop, and lists to open.