Capacitive Force Touchpad with Haptic Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional capacitive touchpads face challenges in accurately detecting user input due to variability in touch threshold caused by factors like skin humidity and environmental conditions, leading to awkward or non-intuitive methods for performing cursor-position associative functions such as clicks and gestures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of capacitive force-sensing technology that determines the X/Y/Z position of a user's finger on a touchpad, providing active tactile feedback to enhance the illusion of pressing on-screen buttons, allowing for intuitive single-, double-, or right-click operations without the need for additional buttons or gestures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional capacitive touch sensors are used to detect user input, then the touchpad can detect finger position on the surface, but the touch threshold varies widely due to skin humidity and environmental conditions leading to inaccurate detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection accuracyVSAvoidtouch threshold consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from surface capacitance (which varies with environmental conditions) to subsurface capacitance at a fixed depth (which remains stable). By measuring capacitance at a consistent depth below the touchpad surface, the system achieves reliable and consistent touch detection thresholds regardless of skin humidity or environmental variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary measurement approach by using multiple capacitive sensors at different depths to indirectly measure the force applied. Instead of directly measuring surface capacitance which is affected by environmental factors, the system measures the displacement of the touchpad surface through subsurface capacitance changes, providing a more reliable indicator of intentional user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional buttons or complex gestures are added to perform cursor-position associative functions, then more functions can be achieved, but the device complexity increases and usability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecursor-position associative functionsVSAvoidbuttons and gestures
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the touchpad surface itself multi-functional by enabling it to detect both position and force application. This allows the same surface to perform multiple cursor-position associative functions (click, double-click, right-click, drag) without requiring separate buttons or complex gesture sequences, simplifying the user interface while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of separate physical buttons into the capacitive touchpad surface by detecting force magnitude and duration. This combination allows single-click, double-click, and other cursor operations to be performed through variations of the same basic interaction (pressing the surface), eliminating the need for additional buttons or complex gesture systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If the touchpad surface is made more sensitive to detect light touches, then lighter input is possible, but accidental touches increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight touch inputVSAvoidaccidental touches
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary discrimination by measuring both the position and force characteristics before registering a touch input. By evaluating the magnitude and duration of the applied force as preliminary conditions, the system can distinguish between intentional light touches and accidental contacts, allowing sensitive detection while filtering out false inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from multiple capacitive sensors to analyze the characteristics of each touch event. By continuously monitoring capacitance changes at different depths and comparing them against established thresholds and patterns, the system provides real-time discrimination between deliberate user input and accidental touches, adjusting recognition based on the measured force characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves user interaction by providing precise and intuitive input methods, reducing errors from accidental touches and enhancing the tactile feedback experience, thus simplifying cursor-position associative functions on touchpads.

Implementation Method 1

conventional capacitive touchpads...sense the position of a user's finger (or fingers) on its surface...sensing the changes in an electrical field using, for example, capacitance or conductance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

an electrostatic actuation mechanism that provides tactile feedback to the user's finger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic forces: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS10068728B2Touchpad with capacitive force sensing
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 SYNAPTICS INC
  • US10068728B2 patent drawing
  • US10068728B2 patent drawing
  • US10068728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are techniques related to a touchpad with capacitive force sensing. The described techniques may determine the point or region of a user-engagement surface contacted by a user. In addition, the described techniques may also determine a force of the user's finger press on the user-engagement surface using one or more capacitance force-sensors. Furthermore, the described techniques may offer active tactile feedback (i.e., haptics) to the user's finger touching the user-engagement surface. This Abstract is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.