Capacitive Sensor Electrode Pulse Timing for Low-Emission Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-frequency cyclic charging of capacitive sensor electrodes in capacitive proximity switches leads to unwanted electromagnetic alternating fields, violating regulatory restrictions on electromagnetic emissions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves varying the charging pulse durations during the evaluation process, allowing for a flexible design and operation of capacitive sensor electrodes by changing the duration of coupling and decoupling cycles, which reduces frequency-dependent radiation peaks and broadens the signal spectrum, thereby minimizing electromagnetic emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-frequency cyclic charging is used to ensure reliable capacitance evaluation in sufficient time, then evaluation speed is improved, but electromagnetic radiation increases violating regulatory restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidelectromagnetic radiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the charging frequency variable rather than fixed. The control unit dynamically adjusts the charging frequency between a first frequency and a second frequency during the evaluation process. This dynamic frequency variation prevents the sensor electrode from consistently operating at frequencies that generate harmful electromagnetic radiation, while still maintaining sufficiently high evaluation speeds through periodic high-frequency charging cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by alternating between different charging frequencies in a structured manner. The control unit switches between the first charging frequency and the second charging frequency during the evaluation process. This periodic frequency modulation ensures that electromagnetic radiation is limited by reducing time spent at high frequencies, while still achieving reliable capacitance evaluation through periodic high-frequency measurement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Device complexity

If fixed charging frequency is used to simplify control, then device complexity is reduced, but electromagnetic radiation peaks increase at specific frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol complexityVSAvoidfrequency-dependent radiation peaks
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing variable frequency control through a control unit that can switch between at least two different charging frequencies. This dynamic frequency adjustment prevents the system from being locked into a single frequency that might coincide with resonant frequencies of the sensor electrode or surrounding structures, thereby avoiding concentrated electromagnetic radiation peaks while maintaining manageable control complexity through predefined frequency switching logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of time

If high charging frequency is used to reduce measurement time, then evaluation speed is improved, but the sensor electrode acts as an antenna emitting electromagnetic radiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement timeVSAvoidelectromagnetic emission
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by using periodic frequency modulation to alternate between high and low charging frequencies during the evaluation process. This allows the system to achieve reliable capacitance measurement through periodic high-frequency cycles while limiting overall electromagnetic emission by spending significant time at lower frequencies. The periodic switching pattern ensures that measurement accuracy is maintained while reducing total exposure to harmful electromagnetic radiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable capacitance evaluation at higher frequencies while adhering to regulatory limits, enhancing flexibility in sensor design and operation, and increasing evaluation speed.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor electrode forms a capacitance with a reference electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

the electrostatic properties of the entire system change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic properties: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

the sensor electrode is coupled to a charging circuit during a coupling time period tK. During the coupling of the sensor electrode to the charging circuit, the sensor electrode is partially or fully charged with electrical charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical charge: Electrical Accumulator

Data Source

PatentEP3474452B1Method for evaluating a capacity value of a capacitive sensor electrode
Publication Date: 2021.11.17 HUF HÜLSBECK & FÜRST GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3474452B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3474452B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3474452B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for evaluating the capacitance value of a capacitive sensor electrode. The method comprises an evaluation process with the following steps: - performing a charging process of the sensor electrode, - evaluating a parameter that depends on the capacitance value of the sensor electrode. A first charging pulse duration tL,1, which consists of a first coupling duration tK,1 and a first decoupling duration tE,1 with tL,1 = tK,1 + tE,1, of a first coupling and decoupling cycle, and a second charging pulse duration tL,2, which consists of a second coupling duration tK,2 and a second decoupling duration tE,2 with tL,2 = tK,2 + tE,2, of a second coupling and decoupling cycle immediately following the first coupling and decoupling cycle, differ from each other by a first pulse duration deviation ΔtL,1.