Capacity-Constrained Recommendation System for Vendor Overload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recommendation systems fail to account for item capacity, leading to user dissatisfaction and vendor overload when demand exceeds available resources, resulting in compromised service quality or rejection of demand.

Innovation Solution

A recommendation system that determines contribution values based on user-item interactions and item capacities, implementing a global optimization scheme to recommend items within each vendor's capacity, ensuring that no item is recommended to more users than it can serve, thereby maximizing matching levels across all users while preventing overload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If recommendation systems recommend items based on user preferences without considering item capacity, then user satisfaction is improved, but vendor overload occurs and service quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidnumber of users served
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces capacity constraints as a new parameter in the recommendation system. By modifying the recommendation algorithm to incorporate item capacity parameters, the system dynamically adjusts recommendations based on both user preferences and vendor capabilities, preventing overload while maintaining service quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of item capacities before generating recommendations. By determining capacity parameters in advance and integrating them into the recommendation process, the system prevents vendor overload before it occurs, ensuring service quality is maintained from the outset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If recommendation systems increase the number of recommendations to maximize user matching, then user satisfaction improves, but item capacity constraints are violated leading to vendor overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching levelVSAvoidcapacity constraint adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic recommendation approach where the system continuously monitors item capacity utilization and adjusts recommendations in real-time. As items are recommended and capacity is consumed, the system dynamically updates the recommendation set to respect capacity constraints while maximizing overall matching levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates recommendations that partially satisfy user preferences by selecting the highest-matching items that remain within capacity constraints. Rather than providing all preferred items, it strategically selects a subset that maximizes overall system efficiency while adhering to capacity limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If recommendation systems provide personalized recommendations for each user independently, then user preference accuracy improves, but global optimization is compromised causing demand imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference accuracyVSAvoidglobal matching efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges individual user preference analysis with global capacity optimization. By combining local preference data with global capacity constraints in a unified recommendation framework, the system achieves both personalized accuracy and global efficiency, preventing demand imbalance across the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where capacity utilization information from individual recommendations feeds back into the global optimization process. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust subsequent recommendations to maintain both user preference accuracy and global matching efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11551282B2System, method, and computer-readable medium for capacity-constrained recommendation
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 INTUIT INC
  • US11551282B2 patent drawing
  • US11551282B2 patent drawing
  • US11551282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides systems, methods and apparatuses for recommending items to users of a recommendation system. In some implementations, the recommendation system determines a plurality of contribution values based on interactions between a plurality of users and a plurality of items. Each of the plurality of contribution values represents a confidence level that a respective user prefers a respective item. The recommendation system further determines a capacity of each of the plurality of items. The capacity of each item represents a maximum number of users to which the item can be recommended. The recommendation system recommends one or more items of the plurality of items to each of the plurality of users based at least in part on the plurality of contribution values and the capacities of the plurality of items.