Capacity-Driven Production Planning GUI for Cost Tradeoff Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing enterprises face challenges in determining optimal inventory levels and manufacturing capacity to meet target customer service levels due to uncertainties in demand and supply chain complexities, leading to inefficiencies in production planning and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface and method for capacity-driven production planning that allows production planners to visualize the impact of capacity decisions on total production costs, enabling them to make informed decisions about excess capacity and inventory levels by separating presentation from underlying calculations and interrelationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional production planning methods are used to meet target service levels, then customer service requirements are satisfied, but inventory costs and production costs increase due to uncertainties in demand and supply chain complexities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service levelVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the production planning process into distinct functional areas (inventory planning, capacity planning, cost analysis) that can be independently optimized. The graphical user interface separates presentation of information from underlying calculations, allowing planners to focus on strategic decisions while the system handles complex computations for inventory levels, capacity requirements, and cost implications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by displaying computed inventory investment amounts and capacity requirements back to the planner through the graphical interface. This allows iterative refinement of production plans, where planners can adjust capacity attributes and immediately see the impact on inventory costs and service levels, enabling continuous optimization of the production plan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If higher inventory levels are maintained to cover demand uncertainty, then customer service level is improved, but inventory-driven costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service levelVSAvoidinventory level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by computing inventory investment amounts based on capacity attributes and demand uncertainty parameters. The system dynamically adjusts recommended inventory levels by changing key parameters such as service level targets, demand variability estimates, and capacity constraints, allowing planners to find optimal balance points that minimize inventory costs while maintaining adequate service levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If capacity planning is performed without visualizing the impact on production costs, then capacity decisions are made, but planners cannot understand cost tradeoffs between excess capacity and inventory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making capabilityVSAvoidcost tradeoff information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The graphical user interface serves as an intermediary between the complex production planning calculations and the planner. It translates raw computational data into visual presentations showing the relationship between capacity decisions and production costs, including breakdowns of inventory investment amounts and their connection to capacity attributes. This intermediary layer prevents information loss by systematically presenting all relevant cost tradeoff information in an accessible format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If complex production planning models are used to optimize production, then production efficiency is improved, but the complexity of the system increases making it difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the computational complexity from the user interface by separating presentation functions from calculation functions. The graphical user interface presents simplified views of production planning information without exposing the underlying mathematical models and algorithms. This extraction allows the system to maintain sophisticated optimization capabilities while presenting a simple, easy-to-use interface to planners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS7774225B2Graphical user interface for capacity-driven production planning tool
Publication Date: 2010.08.10 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US7774225B2 patent drawing
  • US7774225B2 patent drawing
  • US7774225B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Production planning systems and methods are described that enable production planners to see how capacity decisions affect total production costs and to understand the cost trade offs between excess capacity and inventory and, thereby, enable them to make appropriate manufacturing capacity level and inventory level decisions. In one aspect, a graphical user interface separates the presentation of production planning information from the underlying representation of production planning calculations and interrelationships. The graphical user interface frees a production planner from having to handle the underlying references directly and, thereby, allows the production planner to focus instead on the contexts and concepts of production planning (e.g., making strategic decisions regarding excess capacity levels and inventory levels).