Capping Head With Torque-Limited Coupling for Cap Screwing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current capping heads used in capping machines are overly complex and lack simplicity and efficiency in their operational design.

Innovation Solution

A capping head with two identical motorized working units, each comprising a shaft connected via a torque-limited coupling to a transverse arm supporting a rotating roller, which kinematically interacts with the cap to be screwed onto a container, allowing for simplified and efficient cap placement and screwing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional capping heads are used, then caps can be screwed onto containers, but the constructive complexity is considerable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstructive complexityVSAvoidcapping operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The capping head is divided into two independent but identical working units, each capable of performing the complete capping operation. This segmentation allows each unit to be simpler in design while maintaining overall functionality, reducing the constructive complexity of each individual unit compared to traditional single-unit designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each working unit is designed to perform multiple functions: gripping the cap, advancing it onto the container, and screwing it onto the container. This multi-functionality within each unit eliminates the need for additional specialized components, thereby reducing overall constructive complexity while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If traditional capping heads are used, then capping operations can be performed, but operational efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidconstructive simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The working units incorporate a roller that dynamically adapts to the cap geometry during the capping operation. The roller rotates and adjusts its position based on the cap's threaded ring, enabling efficient gripping and screwing motions without requiring complex mechanical linkages, thus improving operational efficiency with simpler construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A torque-limited coupling is introduced as an intermediary element between the drive shaft and the transverse arm. This coupling mediates the power transmission, allowing for controlled torque delivery during the screwing operation, which improves operational efficiency by preventing over-torquing and cap damage while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If two identical working units are used, then functional features are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional featuresVSAvoidconstructive complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

While two working units are used, they are designed to be identical mirror images of each other, creating a form of controlled asymmetry in their arrangement. This approach enhances functional features by providing dual-action capability for handling caps of different orientations, while the identical design of each unit actually reduces complexity compared to designing two different units with complementary functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Both working units are designed with identical components, mechanisms, and dimensions. This homogeneity allows for standardized manufacturing, easier maintenance, and simplified design processes, thereby enhancing functional versatility without proportionally increasing constructive complexity. The identical design enables modular assembly and replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a constructively simple and highly functional capping head capable of efficiently screwing caps onto containers with reduced complexity, enhancing operational efficiency and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

a torque-limited coupling, to a transverse arm adapted to support a rotating roller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque limitation: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7987652B2Capping head
Publication Date: 2011.08.02 WEIGHTPACK
  • US7987652B2 patent drawing
  • US7987652B2 patent drawing
  • US7987652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A capping head comprising a support adapted to be associated with means arranged within a capper comprising at least two identical working units, which are associated with the support and are motorized in the same direction, each working unit comprising a shaft provided with motor drive means, which is connected, with the interposition of a torque-limited coupling, to a transverse arm adapted to support a rotating roller, both rollers are designed to come into contact with a cap to be screwed onto a container.