Capstan Anti-Reversing Pawl Mechanism for Cable Pullers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable puller mechanisms suffer from complex and costly anti-reversing pawl mechanisms that create noise, drag, and wear, making them ineffective at high speeds and prone to damage under high forces.

Innovation Solution

A capstan anti-reversing pawl mechanism utilizing a pawl, drive member, driven member, and flexible coupling, where the pawl is biased to engage the driven member upon disengagement from the flexible coupling, preventing reverse rotation and reducing friction and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional anti-reversing pawl mechanism is used to prevent capstan reversal, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases and assembly time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-reversing function is segmented from the main drive mechanism. The pawl is a separate, simple component that engages with the flexible coupling rather than being integrated into a complex mechanical assembly. This segmentation allows the safety function to be achieved with minimal additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible coupling serves as an intermediary element between the drive chain and the capstan. The pawl engages with this intermediary rather than directly with the capstan or drive chain, simplifying the anti-reversing mechanism while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a traditional anti-reversing pawl mechanism continuously engages the sprocket teeth, then reversal prevention is improved, but drag increases and noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversal preventionVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The pawl mechanism transitions from a static continuous engagement design to a dynamic selective engagement design. The pawl remains disengaged during normal operation and only engages when reversal is detected, reducing continuous drag and noise while maintaining reversal prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pawl mechanism uses the natural reversal motion itself to trigger engagement. When the capstan attempts to reverse, the flexible coupling disengages from the drive chain, automatically allowing the pawl to engage and prevent further reversal without requiring external actuation or continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If a traditional anti-reversing pawl mechanism continuously engages the sprocket teeth, then reversal prevention is improved, but noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversal preventionVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism transitions from continuous static engagement to dynamic selective engagement. The pawl only makes contact with the flexible coupling when reversal occurs, eliminating the continuous noise generated by constant tooth engagement while maintaining effective reversal prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a traditional anti-reversing pawl mechanism is used, then reversal prevention is improved, but wear on the pawl increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversal preventionVSAvoidpawl service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The pawl transitions from continuous engagement to intermittent engagement only when reversal occurs. This dynamic operation dramatically reduces the number of engagement cycles and associated wear on the pawl and flexible coupling, extending their service life while maintaining reversal prevention functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The design converts the potential harm of continuous engagement (excessive wear) into a benefit by using the reversal event itself as the trigger for engagement. The pawl only engages when needed, turning the harmful continuous contact into a beneficial on-demand protection mechanism that minimizes wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a simpler, quieter, and more robust mechanism that effectively prevents capstan reversal at high speeds, reducing wear and drag, and ensuring safety by maintaining mechanical advantage without unnecessary engagement with the sprocket teeth.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible coupling that is in communication with the drive member and driven member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexible coupling: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The pawl is in contact with the flexible coupling and is biased toward the driven member such that if the pawl's engagement with the flexible coupling is removed, then the pawl will engage the driven member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiasing mechanism: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS7384023B2Capstan anti-reversing pawl
Publication Date: 2008.06.10 GREENLEE TEXTRON INC
  • US7384023B2 patent drawing
  • US7384023B2 patent drawing
  • US7384023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anti-reversing pawl mechanism is claimed that includes a pawl that is engaged by a flexible coupling but that is also biased toward a driven member such that when the engagement of the flexible coupling is removed, the pawl engages the driven member and stops it from moving.