Captive Bolt Tool Two-Stage End Effector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current captive bolt tool systems for livestock euthanasia are either aesthetically displeasing due to penetrating methods or insufficient for humane dispatch in non-penetrating methods, as they typically only stun animals without ensuring irrecoverability.

Innovation Solution

A captive bolt tool system with interchangeable subject adapters and a two-stage end effector that allows for humane dispatch by cracking the skull without penetration, varying energy transfer based on adapter shape and operating distance, ensuring efficient kinetic energy transfer for instantaneous insensibility and irrecoverable trauma.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If penetrating captive bolt method is used, then euthanasia effectiveness is improved, but aesthetic appearance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeuthanasia effectivenessVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector is segmented into two distinct stages: a central element for skull cracking and a disk portion for energy transfer. This segmentation allows the first stage to achieve euthanasia effectiveness by cracking the skull without brain penetration, while the second stage handles energy transfer, thereby separating the functions to improve both effectiveness and aesthetics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The central element of the end effector acts as an intermediary component that cracks the skull without penetrating the brain, serving as a mediator between the bolt and the brain tissue. This intermediary action achieves euthanasia effectiveness while preventing the aesthetically displeasing penetration into the brain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Shape

If non-penetrating captive bolt method is used, then aesthetic appearance is improved, but euthanasia effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoideuthanasia effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector parameters are changed by varying the diameter and extension length of the central element relative to the disk portion. This allows optimization of the skull-cracking capability while maintaining non-penetration, thereby improving euthanasia effectiveness without compromising the aesthetic appearance of the non-penetrating method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If single-stage end effector is used, then device complexity is reduced, but energy transfer efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector structureVSAvoidkinetic energy transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector is divided into two functional stages: the central element for initial skull impact and cracking, and the disk portion for subsequent energy transfer. This segmentation optimizes energy transfer efficiency by ensuring efficient kinetic energy transfer from the bolt through the central element to the skull, and then through the disk portion, while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If fixed subject adapter is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadapter configurationVSAvoidlivestock species compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The subject adapter is designed with a universal attachment mechanism that can be selectively removed and replaced with different adapters for different livestock species. This allows a single tool housing to serve multiple functions across different species, improving adaptability while maintaining relatively low device complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables humane dispatch of livestock with efficient energy transfer, eliminating the need for secondary methods by effectively stunning and dispatching animals without penetrating the brain, thus improving the aesthetic and efficacy of the euthanasia process.

Implementation Method 1

transfer the remaining kinetic energy of the moveable bolt, thereby dispatching the livestock without penetrating into the brain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy transfer: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS20140273781A1Captive bolt tool system for use in humane dispatch of livestock
Publication Date: 2014.09.18 BOCK RANDALL
  • US20140273781A1 patent drawing
  • US20140273781A1 patent drawing
  • US20140273781A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A captive bolt tool system includes a tool housing with a working end and a moveable bolt having an end effector. Interchangeable subject adapters may be connected to the tool housing to alter the characteristics of the tool system. A two-stage end effector allows non-penetrating dispatch of livestock.