Captive Panel Fastener Structure for Stable Robotic Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing captive panel fasteners in the electronics industry face instability during high-speed robotic assembly due to a large sidewall gap between the screw and ferrule, leading to misalignment and assembly errors, and prior solutions like o-rings or nuts add cost and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A panel fastener design featuring a collar and flange at the screw shank's bottom, combined with a stronger spring, provides stability to the screw in its retracted state, closing the gap between the screw and ferrule, allowing for misalignment compensation without the need for additional securing components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large sidewall gap is provided between the screw and ferrule to accommodate misalignment, then adaptability to misalignment is improved, but stability during high-speed robotic assembly deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemisalignment accommodationVSAvoidfastener stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The screw shank is segmented into multiple functional zones: an upper portion with a larger diameter that contacts the ferrule inner wall for stability, and a lower threaded portion with a smaller diameter that provides misalignment accommodation. This segmentation allows different sections to fulfill conflicting requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The screw features local quality variation along its length, with the upper shank having a larger diameter for stable contact with the ferrule, and the lower portion having a smaller diameter for misalignment tolerance. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If a hold-down nut or o-ring is added to eliminate screw movement in the ferrule, then stability during assembly is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrew-ferrule stabilityVSAvoidfastener component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the stabilization function from separate components (nuts or o-rings) and integrates it directly into the screw structure itself. The enlarged upper shank diameter provides the stabilizing contact with the ferrule without requiring additional parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilization function is merged with the screw structure by making the upper shank diameter larger than the threaded portion diameter. This combines the fastening function and the stabilization function into a single integrated component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a stronger spring is used to hold the screw in the retracted position, then mechanical stability is improved, but force required to manipulate the screw increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrew position stabilityVSAvoidscrew manipulation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is pre-compressed to a greater extent because the screw starts in a retracted position. This preliminary compression stores energy that automatically propels the screw forward during assembly, reducing the manual force needed by the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic spring force that varies with screw position. The stronger spring provides maximum force when the screw is retracted and least force when extended, creating a dynamic balance that maintains stability while enabling easy manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures mechanical stability suitable for high-speed robotic assembly, reducing costs and complexity by eliminating the need for o-rings or nuts, while maintaining ease of manipulation and assembly accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

The screw is held in the retracted position by a light coil spring operatively positioned around the screw shank between the screw head and the top of the ferrule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3120033B1Stabilized panel fastener
Publication Date: 2022.04.13 PENN ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING CORP
  • EP3120033B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3120033B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3120033B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A panel fastener includes a screw that is captivated to a ferrule and urged toward a retracted position by a spring which operates between the screw head and the ferrule. When the screw is in the retracted position, a collar of enlarged diameter on the screw occupies the area adjacent an internal annular captivation ring of the ferrule. The screw includes a flange that bears directly against the captivation ring providing a stop to prevent removal of the screw. The spring is preferably a coil spring that is operative against an outer flange of the ferrule.