Captive Recoil Spring Assembly with Segmented End Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Captive recoil springs for semiautomatic pistols require tight tolerances in manufacturing due to the small difference between the inner and outer diameters of round wire coil springs, making assembly and disassembly challenging and prone to issues where the spring can become a projectile during disassembly.

Innovation Solution

A recoil spring assembly design that uses a guide rod with a base and body that captures the coil spring at specific sectors, allowing for looser tolerances in manufacturing and preventing the spring from becoming a projectile during disassembly, by engaging the spring at diametrically opposite sectors and leaving others free to interact with the slide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a round wire coil spring is used with a small difference between inner and outer diameters, then the spring structure is simple and compact, but the manufacturing tolerances for the end cap and slide opening must be very tight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring structureVSAvoidtolerances
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is divided into multiple radial sectors (first sector, second sector, third sector, fourth sector) that can be independently configured. Some sectors engage the coil spring while others leave the spring exposed, allowing the spring to be captured without requiring tight tolerances on the entire circumference. This segmentation enables the use of round wire springs with simpler manufacturing while maintaining secure capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different radial sectors of the end cap have different engagement characteristics with the coil spring. The first and second sectors engage the spring to provide capture, while the third and fourth sectors leave the spring exposed for engagement with the slide. This local differentiation allows the end cap to perform multiple functions with relaxed overall tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the end cap is made smaller than the outer diameter of the coil spring to capture it, then the spring is secured, but an outer portion of the spring end remains exposed requiring tight tolerances on the slide opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring captureVSAvoidslide opening tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is segmented radially into multiple sectors with different functions. The third and fourth sectors are configured to leave the spring exposed, creating dedicated engagement zones that work with the slide without requiring tight tolerances on the slide opening. This segmentation distributes the functional requirements across different sectors rather than requiring uniform precision around the entire circumference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If tight tolerances are used for the end cap and slide opening, then the spring engagement is precise, but assembly and disassembly become challenging and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement precisionVSAvoidassembly and disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented sector design allows for easier assembly and disassembly by providing designated engagement zones. The third and fourth sectors that leave the spring exposed facilitate interaction with the slide, making assembly and disassembly operations simpler and faster while maintaining precise engagement where needed through the first and second sectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the coil spring is fully captured by the end cap, then the spring is secured, but it can become a projectile during disassembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring securityVSAvoidprojectile hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is segmented to provide both capture and exposure functions. The third and fourth sectors leave the spring exposed rather than fully capturing it, which prevents the spring from becoming a projectile during disassembly while the first and second sectors provide sufficient capture to secure the spring in normal operation. This segmented approach balances security with safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Ease of operation

If loose tolerances are used for manufacturing, then assembly and disassembly are easier, but the spring engagement may be unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly and disassemblyVSAvoidspring engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented sector configuration provides reliable spring engagement through the first and second sectors while maintaining ease of operation through the third and fourth sectors. This segmentation allows the design to achieve both goals simultaneously by distributing different functional requirements across different sectors rather than requiring uniform tolerances throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10145634B2Pistol and captive recoil spring
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 SMITH & WESSON INC
  • US10145634B2 patent drawing
  • US10145634B2 patent drawing
  • US10145634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A captive recoil spring assembly includes a guide rod surrounded by a coil spring. The spring is captured between a base at one end of the guide rod, and a body at its opposite end. The body is shaped to engage the spring at one or more sectors, leaving one or more remaining sectors free to engage the slide. Use of such a body permits a round wire spring to be used without the need for close dimensional tolerances on the engaging parts.