Cardiac Rhythm Management Capture Verification Mode Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cardiac rhythm management systems face challenges in accurately determining the capture threshold for pacing pulses, leading to inefficient energy expenditure and potential discomfort for patients, as they struggle to reliably select the appropriate capture verification mode to adjust pacing energy effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for selecting capture verification modes, including automatic beat-by-beat capture detection and capture threshold testing, are implemented using a cardiac rhythm management system with electrodes, a pulse generator, and processor circuitry to evaluate and select the most effective capture verification mode based on the patient's conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If capture threshold testing is performed without beat-by-beat detection, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of capture threshold deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture verification system complexityVSAvoidcapture threshold measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between two capture verification modes: automatic capture detection mode for continuous monitoring and capture threshold testing mode for periodic threshold determination. The controller selects the appropriate mode based on operational requirements, allowing the system to adapt its complexity level and measurement precision dynamically rather than being fixed in one approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs capture threshold testing at periodic intervals using structured threshold search algorithms (such as binary search or stepwise reduction methods) rather than continuous monitoring. This periodic approach reduces overall device complexity and power consumption while maintaining adequate measurement precision through scheduled verification events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If pace pulse energy is increased to ensure capture, then reliability of capture is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture reliabilityVSAvoidpacing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automatic capture detection to continuously monitor whether each paced beat produces the desired cardiac response. When capture is detected, the system receives feedback confirmation and can maintain or reduce pacing energy. When capture is not detected, the system increases energy delivery to ensure reliable capture, creating a closed-loop feedback control system that optimizes energy usage based on actual capture outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts pacing pulse parameters (amplitude, width, or both) based on detected capture status and determined threshold values. By changing these parameters in response to measured conditions rather than maintaining fixed high-energy delivery, the system achieves reliable capture while minimizing overall energy consumption through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If beat-by-beat capture detection is implemented, then measurement precision of capture status is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture detection accuracyVSAvoidcapture verification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between two capture verification modes: automatic capture detection mode for continuous monitoring and capture threshold testing mode for periodic threshold determination. The controller selects the appropriate mode based on operational requirements, allowing the system to adapt its complexity level and measurement precision dynamically rather than being fixed in one approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The same sensing electrodes and signal processing circuitry are used for multiple functions: detecting evoked responses for capture verification, measuring pacing artifacts for threshold determination, and monitoring cardiac electrical activity. This multi-functional use of existing components achieves high measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7657314B2Methods and systems for selecting capture verification modes
Publication Date: 2010.02.02 CARDIAC PACEMAKERS INC
  • US7657314B2 patent drawing
  • US7657314B2 patent drawing
  • US7657314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are directed to selecting from a variety of capture verification modes. A plurality of capture verification modes, including a beat by beat capture detection mode and a capture threshold testing mode without intervening beat by beat capture detection is provided. An efficacy of at least one of the capture verification modes is evaluated and, based on the evaluation, a capture verification mode is selected.