Metal Carbide Nanotube Electrocatalyst for Corrosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electrocatalyst materials, particularly those based on carbon and metal carbides, suffer from oxidative corrosion under high voltage conditions, leading to degradation and reduced fuel cell performance.

Innovation Solution

The development of an electrocatalyst material using metal carbide nanotubes as a support material, with a metal or metal alloy deposited on these nanotubes, prepared through electrospinning and calcination processes, to enhance stability and performance for hydrogen oxidation, oxygen reduction, and hydrogen evolution reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional carbon or metal carbide supports are used, then the electrocatalyst can be manufactured easily and at low cost, but the support undergoes oxidative corrosion under high voltage conditions leading to catalyst degradation and reduced performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of electrocatalystVSAvoidoxidative corrosion of support
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite material structure consisting of metal carbide nanotubes (inner core) surrounded by a porous carbon shell (outer layer). This composite architecture combines the oxidation resistance of metal carbides with the electrical conductivity and chemical stability of carbon, creating a support material that resists oxidative corrosion while maintaining catalytic performance. The metal carbide core provides structural stability and corrosion resistance, while the carbon shell ensures electrical conductivity and facilitates electron transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different materials with specific properties to different regions of the support structure. The inner core uses metal carbide for its oxidation resistance, while the outer shell uses carbon for its electrical conductivity and chemical inertness. This spatial differentiation of material properties allows each component to perform its optimal function: the core protects against corrosion while the shell facilitates electrical processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the electrocatalyst is designed to resist oxidative corrosion through advanced materials, then reliability improves, but the manufacturing complexity and process difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability under stress testsVSAvoidcomplexity of nanotube synthesis process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a polymer template as an intermediary structure during synthesis. The polymer nanofibers serve as a sacrificial template that guides the formation of metal carbide nanotubes and subsequently defines the structure of the porous carbon shell. After the composite structure is formed, the polymer template is removed through calcination, leaving behind the desired nanotube architecture. This intermediary approach simplifies the overall synthesis by providing a pre-formed structural guide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The synthesis process begins by first forming the polymer template structure, then depositing metal precursors onto it, converting to metal carbide, and finally forming the carbon shell before removing the template. This preliminary formation of the polymer scaffold allows subsequent steps to proceed more easily, as the structural framework is already in place to guide material deposition and transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The electrocatalyst material demonstrates improved stability and performance compared to traditional carbon and metal carbide supports, maintaining high platinum surface area and electrochemical surface area even under accelerated stress tests, indicating enhanced durability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

electrospinning a suitable metal precursor in the presence of a carrier polymer to form electrospun structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrospinning: Electrohydrodynamics

Implementation Method 2

calcination of the electrospun structures to remove the carrier polymer and form metal oxide electrospun structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCalcination: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

carburation to convert the metal oxide electrospun structures into metal carbide nanotubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarburation: Carburizing

Implementation Method 4

electrocatalyst material designed for the specific electrocatalytic reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 5

Electrochemical reactions occur at the electrodes, and the chemical energy of the fuel and the oxidant is converted to electrical energy and heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentUS11264624B2Electrocatalyst
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 UNIV MONTPELLIER
  • US11264624B2 patent drawing
  • US11264624B2 patent drawing
  • US11264624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrocatalyst material having improved stability to corrosion compared to existing conductive high surface area carbon and metal carbide support materials is disclosed. The electrocatalyst material comprises (i) metal carbide nanotubes and (ii) a metal or metal alloy deposited on the metal carbide nanotubes. The electrocatalyst material is suitable for oxidising hydrogen, reducing oxygen or evolving hydrogen.