Carbon Agglomerate Solid-Phase Sintering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The depletion of caking coal and the need to utilize carbonaceous materials with poor softening and melting properties for carbon agglomerate production poses challenges in achieving high-strength carbon agglomerate suitable for blast furnaces, as conventional liquid-phase sintering methods are inadequate.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pressure molding of carbonaceous powder with controlled volatile content, O/C ratio, and particle size, at elevated temperatures in an oxygen-excluded environment to induce solid-phase sintering, forming high-strength carbon agglomerate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional liquid-phase sintering methods are used to produce carbon agglomerate, then high strength can be achieved, but the method requires caking coal with softening and melting properties which is becoming depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon agglomerate strengthVSAvoidraw material selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of sintering mechanism from liquid-phase to solid-phase sintering. By controlling particle size distribution (maximum 300 μm with specific proportions) and applying solid-phase sintering conditions, the method enables production of high-strength carbon agglomerate using non-caking coal that cannot be processed by conventional liquid-phase methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes the chemical-mechanical bonding mechanism (liquid-phase sintering requiring softening and melting) with a purely mechanical bonding mechanism (solid-phase sintering through particle compression and deformation). This replacement allows use of raw materials that lack the necessary chemical properties for liquid-phase sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If carbonaceous materials with poor softening and melting property are used, then raw material availability increases, but conventional liquid-phase sintering cannot achieve sufficient bonding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveraw material selection flexibilityVSAvoidcarbon agglomerate strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the bonding mechanism parameter from liquid-phase to solid-phase sintering, which fundamentally alters how particles bond together. This parameter change enables effective bonding of carbonaceous materials that lack softening and melting properties, thereby achieving both raw material versatility and product strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality control through specific particle size distribution requirements (maximum 300 μm with defined proportions of different size ranges). This local control of particle characteristics ensures adequate bonding in solid-phase sintering while maintaining the ability to use diverse non-caking coal types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If caking coal is extensively ground to achieve fine particle size for good bonding, then particle bonding improves, but plasticity decreases making the process inappropriate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle bonding qualityVSAvoidcoal plasticity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the liquid-phase bonding mechanism (which requires plastic deformation and softening) with solid-phase sintering. This substitution eliminates the need for excessive particle size reduction and plasticity, as solid-phase sintering achieves bonding through mechanical compression and deformation at particle contact points rather than requiring bulk material plasticity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of high-strength carbon agglomerate capable of withstanding blast furnace conditions, even with increased use of materials with poor softening and melting properties, without relying on liquid-phase components.

Implementation Method 1

the particles of the carbonaceous powder are bonded to each other by a solid-phase sintering phenomenon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid-phase sintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

by pressure molding a defined carbonaceous powder while heating at a temperature range of 600 °C or more

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure molding: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP4656617A1Method for producing carbon briquette
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP4656617A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4656617A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4656617A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing carbon agglomerate is provided, capable of producing carbon agglomerate having high strength capable of withstanding use in a blast furnace even when a usage amount of carbonaceous raw material that has poor softening and melting property is increased. The method includes: a powder preparation process of preparing a carbonaceous powder having a volatile content of 6 wt% D.B. or more and less than 20 wt% D.B., an O/C ratio representing an atomic ratio of O atoms to C atoms of 0.040 or more, and a maximum particle size of 300 µm or less; and a hot pressing process of pressure molding the carbonaceous powder under a set of conditions including a maximum arrival temperature of 600 °C to 1250 °C in an oxygen-excluded environment to obtain the carbon agglomerate.