Carbon Emission Allowance Allocation by Relative Intensity
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing methods for allocating carbon emission allowances are not rational, leading to a waste of allowances for lower-emission manufacturing entities and a shortage for higher-emission entities, resulting in high costs for energy conservation and emission reduction.
Innovation Solution
The method involves determining a relative carbon emission intensity value for each manufacturing entity based on the maximum and minimum carbon emission intensity values of similar entities, and then allocating carbon emission allowances for a subsequent time period using these relative values, production plans, and a regulating coefficient.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If carbon emission allowance is allocated based on previous time period data without considering process differences, then allocation simplicity is maintained, but allocation rationality deteriorates leading to waste for lower-emission entities and shortage for higher-emission entities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by differentiating carbon emission allowance allocation based on process types. Manufacturing entities with the same process type form groups, and each group receives allocation based on its specific characteristics rather than a uniform approach. This ensures that entities with similar production processes are treated equally while different process types receive differentiated treatment, improving allocation rationality without significantly increasing complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments manufacturing entities into different groups based on their process types. By dividing the overall population of manufacturing entities into sub-groups with similar characteristics, the allocation can be tailored to each segment's specific needs and emission patterns, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and rationality
2Device complexity
If uniform carbon emission allowance allocation is applied to all manufacturing entities, then administrative complexity is reduced, but energy conservation and emission reduction costs increase for higher-emission entities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements local quality by applying different allocation rules to different process type groups. Entities with the same process type receive allocation based on their relative carbon emission intensity within that group, while different process types are allocated independently. This targeted approach reduces unnecessary emission reduction costs for entities that are already efficient in their specific process context
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the allocation parameter from a uniform standard to a relative carbon emission intensity metric that is calculated separately for each process type group. This parameter change allows the system to account for process-specific characteristics, reducing the burden on higher-emission entities that face structural emission challenges inherent to their process type
Data Source
AI summary
The present disclosure provides an allocating method and device of carbon emission allowance, and a computer-readable storage medium. The allocating method includes: obtaining a maximum value and a minimum value in a first time period of carbon emission intensity values of a plurality of manufacturing entities, wherein the manufacturing entities has at least one process type of the same; determining a relative carbon emission intensity value of each manufacturing entity according to a carbon emission intensity value of each manufacturing entity, the maximum value and the minimum value; and allocating a carbon emission allowance for a second time period after the first time period to each manufacturing entity according to the relative carbon emission intensity value of each manufacturing entity.