Carbon Fiber Bundle Oxidation Control for Strength and Toughness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for enhancing the tensile strength of carbon fibers have not been sufficient, particularly in achieving high tensile strength and fracture toughness without increasing flaw size, and have not effectively balanced tensile strength with compressive strength in carbon fiber-reinforced composites.

Innovation Solution

A bundle of carbon fibers is manufactured using a specific oxidation process and carbonization method that controls the stress-strain curve nonlinearity and orientation parameter of crystallites, achieving a tensile strength of 7.5 GPa or more and a tensile modulus of 240 to 440 GPa, with a controlled single-fiber diameter and fragmentation method to optimize fiber reinforcement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If oxidation temperature is increased by using a plurality of ovens different in temperature, then tensile strength of carbon fiber is improved, but manufacturing complexity and process time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidnumber of ovens
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the oxidation temperature profile within a single-oven system. Specifically, it controls the oxidation temperature to be 200°C to 400°C, with a preferred range of 250°C to 350°C, and maintains this temperature for 1 to 10 hours. This parameter optimization achieves high tensile strength (5.0 GPa or more) without requiring multiple ovens, thereby resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and device complexity reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a controlled oxidation atmosphere within the single-oven system. It uses a specific gas mixture (oxygen concentration of 5% to 30%) and controls humidity (dew point of -40°C to 0°C) to create optimal local conditions for oxidation. This localized control of oxidation conditions enables high tensile strength achievement while avoiding the need for multiple ovens with different temperature zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If oxidation time is extended to improve tensile strength, then fracture toughness increases, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture toughnessVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the contradiction between fracture toughness improvement and productivity by optimizing the oxidation time parameter to 1 to 10 hours, with a preferred range of 2 to 8 hours. This optimized time frame, combined with the controlled temperature (200°C to 400°C) and oxygen concentration (5% to 30%), achieves high fracture toughness while maintaining reasonable production efficiency, avoiding both excessive oxidation time and insufficient strength development

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If oxygen concentration is increased to enhance oxidation effect, then tensile strength improves, but fiber damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidfiber damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the contradiction between tensile strength improvement and fiber damage by optimizing the oxygen concentration parameter to 5% to 30%, with a preferred range of 10% to 20%. This optimized oxygen level, combined with controlled temperature (200°C to 400°C) and oxidation time (1 to 10 hours), achieves high tensile strength (5.0 GPa or more) while preventing excessive oxidation that would cause fiber damage. The patent also monitors oxidation progression by tracking specific gravity changes to stop the process at the optimal point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If single-fiber fineness is reduced to improve tensile strength, then strength increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidfiber diameter control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the contradiction between tensile strength improvement and manufacturing precision by optimizing the single-fiber fineness parameter to 0.5 dtex to 2.0 dtex, with a preferred range of 0.7 dtex to 1.5 dtex. This optimized fineness range, combined with controlled oxidation parameters (temperature: 200°C to 400°C, time: 1 to 10 hours, oxygen concentration: 5% to 30%), achieves high tensile strength while maintaining manageable manufacturing precision requirements. The patent also controls the orientation parameter of crystallites (0.60 to 0.80) to ensure uniform fiber properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in a high-performance carbon fiber-reinforced composite with enhanced tensile strength and fracture toughness, effectively increasing the tensile strength of the composite while maintaining a balance with compressive strength.

Implementation Method 1

as methods of improving tensile strength and modulus of carbon fibers, there have been proposed methods in which an oxidation temperature is increased by using a plurality of ovens different in temperature in an oxidation process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

a carbon fiber manufacturing method includes: performing a first oxidation process that oxidates a precursor fiber bundle for a polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonization: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS10023979B2Bundle of carbon fibers and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 TORAY INDUSTRIES INC
  • US10023979B2 patent drawing
  • US10023979B2 patent drawing
  • US10023979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bundle of carbon fibers has a value A obtained from a nonlinear approximation formula of a stress σ-strain ε curve in a tensile strength test of resin-impregnated strands and an orientation parameter Π (%) of crystallites in a wide-angle x-ray diffraction measurement which satisfy a predetermined relational expression, and has tensile strength with a predetermined value or more, and tensile modulus within a predetermined range and a product E×d/W of a ratio d/W of a single-fiber diameter d to a loop width W just before loop fracture evaluated by a single-fiber loop test and a tensile modulus E of the strands has a predetermined value or more, or apparent single-fiber stress has a predetermined value or more when the number of fiber breaks by a single-fiber fragmentation method for a single-fiber composite is 0.30 breaks/mm and when the number of the fiber breaks by the single-fiber fragmentation method for the single-fiber composite is 0.30 breaks/mm, the number of fiber breaks by a double-fiber fragmentation method for the single-fiber composite is within a predetermined range.