Carbon Foam Yield via Foaming Sheet Mediator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The yield of carbon foam is reduced due to the formation of a crust and defects during the foaming process, leading to increased production costs and resource expenditure, as the crust must be removed and defects occur, which also affect the quality and utility of the final product.

Innovation Solution

A foaming sheet, typically a smooth, continuous sheet such as aluminum foil, is placed on the top surface of the carbon material during the foaming process to inhibit crust formation and support bubble growth, thereby increasing the yield and reducing defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If foaming procedures are conducted without a foaming sheet, then the process is simpler, but crust formation reduces carbon foam yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon foam yieldVSAvoidfoaming process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A foaming sheet is introduced as an intermediary element between the heating apparatus and the carbon material during foaming procedures. The sheet acts as a mediator that prevents direct contact between the carbon material and the heating source, thereby inhibiting crust formation on the top surface of the carbon foam while allowing the foaming process to proceed. This intermediary layer resolves the contradiction by sacrificing minimal process complexity (adding a sheet) to achieve significant reduction in substance loss (preventing crust formation and increasing yield).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If foaming is conducted at higher temperatures to increase foam production, then productivity increases, but crust formation and defects worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon foam production rateVSAvoidcarbon foam quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The foaming sheet creates a localized difference in thermal environment at the top surface of the carbon material. The area beneath the foaming sheet experiences modified heat transfer conditions compared to uncovered areas, resulting in more uniform foam cell formation and reduced crust formation. This local modification of quality (thermal environment) allows high-temperature foaming to proceed while maintaining product quality, resolving the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the foaming sheet is too heavy, then it provides better support for bubble growth, but the sheet sinks into the plastic coal mass

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble growth supportVSAvoidfoam uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The solution involves carefully selecting and adjusting parameters of the foaming sheet, particularly its areal density and material properties, to achieve optimal performance. The sheet must have sufficient weight to provide support for bubble growth and maintain contact with the carbon material surface, but not so heavy that it sinks into the plastic coal mass during foaming. By optimizing these parameters, both strength (bubble support) and shape (foam uniformity) requirements are satisfied simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of a foaming sheet significantly reduces crust formation, increases the amount of carbon foam produced, and improves the mechanical strength and uniformity of the final product, making the production process more economically feasible and efficient.

Implementation Method 1

support bubble growth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 2

heating the loaded particulate coal to a temperature ranging from about 300° C. to about 500° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

the loaded particulate coal turns into a plastic coal mass during heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS7766984B2Method of increasing carbon foam yield
Publication Date: 2010.08.03 CFOAM LLC
  • US7766984B2 patent drawing
  • US7766984B2 patent drawing
  • US7766984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for increasing the yield of carbon foam is described. The method includes placing a foaming sheet over the top surface of the material to be foamed. In certain embodiments, the foaming sheet is placed over the top surface of particulate coal prior to and during the foaming process. In some embodiments the foaming sheet is a smooth, continuous sheet, such as aluminum foil or the like. The resulting carbon product includes an increased amount of usable carbon foam.