Carbon Layer Atomic Etch With High-Energy Directional Ion Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing atomic layer etching processes for carbon containing layers are slow and lack directional ion flow, resulting in low aspect ratio features and poor selectivity due to the use of low bias voltages that prevent physical sputtering.

Innovation Solution

A cyclical process involving exposure to oxygen radicals followed by high-energy ion bombardment for less than 0.5 seconds, with controlled bias between 100 eV and 2000 eV, to modify and remove the carbon containing layer, combined with optional passivation to reduce sidewall undercutting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If low bias voltage is used to prevent physical sputtering, then selectivity is improved, but etching speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch selectivityVSAvoidetching speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a cyclical process alternating between a modification step (with low bias voltage to prevent sputtering and maintain selectivity) and a removal step (with high bias voltage to enable fast removal). This periodic switching allows the system to achieve both high selectivity during modification and high etching speed during removal, resolving the contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The etching process is divided into distinct segments: a modification step using oxygen radicals at low bias voltage to selectively modify the carbon-containing layer, and a removal step using high-energy ions at high bias voltage to rapidly remove the modified material. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized for its specific function, achieving both selectivity and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If low bias voltage is used to prevent physical sputtering, then selectivity is improved, but aspect ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch selectivityVSAvoidfeature aspect ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

By periodically switching between low bias voltage (during modification) and high bias voltage (during removal), the process achieves directional ion flow during the removal step that enables high aspect ratio features, while maintaining selectivity during the modification step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The process segments the etching into modification and removal steps, with the removal step using high bias voltage to provide directional ion flow for high aspect ratio, while the modification step uses low bias voltage to maintain selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If atomic layer etching removes a few atomic layers per cycle, then selectivity is improved, but etching speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch selectivityVSAvoidetch speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclical process alternates between a modification step that modifies a controlled amount of material and a removal step that rapidly removes the modified material. This periodic action allows selective modification followed by fast removal, resolving the speed-selectivity tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The etching process is segmented into modification and removal phases. The modification step uses oxygen radicals to selectively modify the carbon-containing layer, and the removal step uses high-energy ion bombardment to rapidly remove the modified material, achieving both selectivity and high etching speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances etching speed and selectivity, achieving up to five times the etch rate of individual steps, with improved feature aspect ratios and reduced physical sputtering.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the carbon containing etch layer to oxygen radicals to modify part of the carbon containing etch layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadical reaction:

Implementation Method 2

oxygen radicals are absorbed into the carbon containing etch layer to form a modified part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

the bombardment ions remove the modified part of the carbon containing etch layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical sputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 4

exposes the etch layer to bombardment ions with an energy greater than 100 eV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon bombardment: Ion Beam

Data Source

PatentUS20250218774A1High energy atomic layer etch of a carbon containing layer
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 LAM RES CORP
  • US20250218774A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218774A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218774A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprises a plurality of cycles, wherein each cycle, comprises exposing the carbon containing etch layer to oxygen radicals to modify part of the carbon containing etch layer. The carbon containing etch layer is exposed to bombardment ions with an energy greater than 100 eV for less than 0.5 seconds, wherein the bombardment ions remove the modified part of the carbon containing etch layer to form etched features.