Amorphous Carbon Mask Patterning via Oxide Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Contamination of the amorphous carbon layer during milling by metallic residue from a metal mask affects the control dimensions and fidelity of patterning in the pattern fabrication process, making it difficult to clean without damaging the magnetic properties.

Innovation Solution

Replacing the metal mask with an oxide layer and using chemical etching processes, such as reactive ion beam etching with gases like CHF3 and O2, to remove residual layers and prevent contamination, ensuring high fidelity image transfer and clean surfaces for patterning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a metal mask is used to transfer the pattern image, then the pattern can be transferred to the magnetic layer, but metallic residue contaminates the amorphous carbon mask layer, degrading patterning precision and magnetic layer properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidmetallic residue contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the metal mask from the patterning process entirely, replacing it with a metal-free amorphous carbon mask layer. This eliminates the source of metallic residue contamination while maintaining the essential pattern transfer function through sequential etching processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an amorphous carbon mask layer as an intermediary material between the pattern source and the magnetic layer. This intermediary serves the pattern transfer function without introducing harmful metallic contamination, and can be cleanly removed after patterning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If metallic residue is cleaned from the amorphous carbon layer, then contamination is reduced, but the magnetic properties of the magnetic layer are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination levelVSAvoidmagnetic layer properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a disposable amorphous carbon mask layer that is intentionally designed to be temporary and easily removable. This mask performs its pattern transfer function and is then cleanly removed using oxygen plasma or chemical methods, leaving no harmful residue and preserving magnetic layer integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical or chemical cleaning methods that could damage the magnetic layer with a controlled oxygen plasma removal process. This substitution allows for clean mask removal without affecting the magnetic properties of the underlying layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the amorphous carbon mask layer is used instead of metal mask, then metallic residue contamination is prevented, but additional process steps are required for mask removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetallic residue contaminationVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent exploits the chemical parameter differences between amorphous carbon and the magnetic layer. By using oxygen plasma, which selectively reacts with and removes carbon-based materials, the mask is eliminated without affecting the magnetic layer, simplifying the overall process despite the additional removal step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively prevents contamination, maintains high fidelity and control dimensions, and ensures the magnetic properties are not affected, resulting in a simple, cost-effective, and fast patterning process with high-quality throughput.

Implementation Method 1

chemical etching processes, such as reactive ion beam etching with gases like CHF3 and O2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReactive ion beam etching: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

chemical etching processes, such as reactive ion beam etching with gases like CHF3 and O2, to remove residual layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

oxidation to remove organic residue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS9809887B2Method of patterning a stack
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US9809887B2 patent drawing
  • US9809887B2 patent drawing
  • US9809887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The embodiments disclose a method of fabricating a stack, including replacing a metal layer of a stack imprint structure with an oxide layer, patterning the oxide layer stack using chemical etch processes to transfer the pattern image and cleaning etch residue from the stack imprint structure to substantially prevent contamination of the metal layers.